journal article·2016-04-01Open access

The influence of incident shock Mach number on radial incident shock wave focusing

Xin Chen, Sheng Tan, Liming He, Kang Rong, Qiang Zhang, Xiaobin Zhu

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 4

Abstract

Experiments and numerical simulations were carried out to investigate radial incident shock focusing on a test section where the planar incident shock wave was divided into two identical ones. A conventional shock tube was used to generate the planar shock. Incident shock Mach number of 1.51, 1.84 and 2.18 were tested. CCD camera was used to obtain the schlieren photos of the flow field. Third-order, three step strong-stability-preserving (SSP) Runge-Kutta method, third-order weighed essential non-oscillation (WENO) scheme and adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithm were adopted to simulate the complicated flow fields characterized by shock wave interaction. Good agreement between experimental and numerical results was observed. Complex shock wave configurations and interactions (such as shock reflection, shock-vortex interaction and shock focusing) were observed in both the experiments and numerical results. Some new features were observed and discussed. The differences of structure of flow field and the variation trends of pressure were compared and analyzed under the condition of different Mach numbers while shock wave focusing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Fluid Mechan. · 1976 · 73 · 65110.1017/S0022112076001559 ↗
2. Shock Waves · 1991 · 1 · 341
3. Shock Waves · 1994 · 3 · 21310.1007/BF01414715 ↗
4. Computers and Fluids · 1998 · 27 · 61110.1016/S0045-7930(97)00058-3 ↗
5. Shock Waves · 1999 · 9 · 3110.1007/s001930050136 ↗
6. Shock Waves · 2000 · 10 · 7710.1007/s001930050181 ↗
7. J. Fluid Mechan. · 2007 · 580 · 48110.1017/S0022112007005757 ↗
8. 2007 · 414
9. J. Fluid Mechan. · 2009 · 641 · 29710.1017/S0022112009991492 ↗
10. Shock Waves · 2012 · 22 · 641
11. J. Fluid Mechan. · 1977 · 73 · 651
12. AIAA J. · 1981 · 19 · 25710.2514/3.7770 ↗
13. Comput. Fluids · 1998 · 27 · 55310.1016/S0045-7930(97)00063-7 ↗
14. Shock Waves · 2005 · 14 · 29910.1007/s00193-005-0277-2 ↗
15. 1550-1557
16. Shock Waves · 2010 · 20 · 110.1007/s00193-009-0227-5 ↗
17. Shock Waves · 2002 · 11 · 32310.1007/s001930100115 ↗
18. 2001 · 223-238
19. 2001 · 31-44
20. I. A. Leyva, V. Tangirala, and A. J. Dean, 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit: Investigation of unsteady flow field in a 2-Stage PDE resonator (Reno, Nevada, (2003) p. 1-9.10.2514/6.2003-715 ↗
21. J. Computat. Phys. · 2011 · 230 · 759810.1016/j.jcp.2011.06.016 ↗
22. M. Berger, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, California, 1982.
23. R. Deiterding, Ph.D. thesis, Brandenburgische Technische University, Cottbus, 2003.
24. ESAIM: PROCEEDING · 2011 · 34 · 9710.1051/proc/201134002 ↗