Tailoring of magnetic properties of ultrathin epitaxial Fe films by Dy doping
Source abstract
Abstract
We report on the controlled modification of relaxation parameters and magnetic moments of epitaxial Fe thin films through Dy doping. Ferromagnetic resonance measurements show that an increase of Dy doping from 0.1% to 5% gives a tripling in Gilbert damping, and more importantly a strongly enhanced anisotropic damping that can be qualitatively understood through the slow-relaxing impurity model. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements show a pronounced suppression of the orbital moment of the Fe with Dy doping, leading to an almost threefold drop in the orbital to spin moment ratio, ml/ms. Doping with Dy can therefore be used to control both dynamic and static properties of thin ferromagnetic films for improved performance in spintronics device applications, mediated through the antiferromagnetic interaction of the 4f and 3d states.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Oxford 1 Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, , Oxford, OX1 3PU, United Kingdom
Magnetic Spectroscopy Group 2 , Diamond Light Source, Didcot, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
Funding
Advanced Light Source · Diamond Light Source · John Fell Fund, University of Oxford
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 16520910.1088/0953-8984/19/16/165209 ↗
2. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 121710.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.013 ↗
3. Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 6710.1038/nphys783 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A30810.1063/1.4862091 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 174910.1109/20.950957 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 18441210.1103/PhysRevB.89.184412 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 865910.1063/1.1452708 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 125410.1063/1.1544642 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 25760210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.257602 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1963 · 11 · 6510.1103/PhysRevLett.11.65 ↗
11. Chinese Phys. B · 2015 · 24 · 01710110.1088/1674-1056/24/1/017101 ↗
12. J. Less-Common Met. · 1970 · 21 · 15110.1016/0022-5088(70)90113-X ↗
13. J. Phys.: Condens. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · R112310.1088/0953-8984/15/25/202 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 659210.1063/1.1669338 ↗
15. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1998 · 61 · 75510.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 214010.1063/1.113929 ↗
17. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 198 · 38410.1016/S0304-8853(98)01142-1 ↗
18. New J. Phys. · 2009 · 11 · 06300310.1088/1367-2630/11/6/063003 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 09390910.1063/1.2197087 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 10441610.1103/PhysRevB.76.104416 ↗
21. Br. J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 18 · 72710.1088/0508-3443/18/6/304 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1959 · 3 · 3010.1103/PhysRevLett.3.30 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 1970 · 41 · 129510.1063/1.1658916 ↗
24. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2013 · 430 · 01212710.1088/1742-6596/430/1/012127 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 194310.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1943 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 69410.1103/PhysRevLett.70.694 ↗