journal article·2022-09-01Open access

Magnetic field measurements and experimental verification of 0.5-MeV permanent-magnet electron-beam-spread system

Zijian Zhou, Taiyan Chen, Keyan Sheng, Jiang Huang

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 9

Abstract

In this work, a permanent-magnet electron-beam-spread system for irradiation has been developed and constructed, and its performance was experimentally measured with a beam. This work is helpful to counter beam-tail sweep issues (resulting in excessive doses at the ends of each sweep). Using the beam’s optical transmission matrix and beam dynamics simulations, we analyzed the impact of the individual parameters of a special quadrupole magnet and a special octupole magnet on the beam spread, and we determined the optimal parameters for irradiation production. To meet the design requirements of the magnetic field, the yoke structure was optimized, and permanent magnets with very similar degrees of magnetization and small magnetic declinations were used. The permanent-magnet electron-beam-spread system was applied to an actual 0.5-MeV electron irradiation accelerator, and the engineering feasibility of the permanent magnet electron beam spread system was fully verified by measuring the uniformity of the beam after the spread.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers · Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Engineering and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Program for HUST Academic Frontier Youth Team

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 02190310.1063/5.0010841 ↗
2. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2012 · 81 · 111110.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.10.025 ↗
3. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2018 · 150 · 910.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.04.008 ↗
4. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2019 · 165 · 10837710.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108377 ↗
5. ACS Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 2 · 85210.1021/acsestwater.2c00040 ↗
6. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2021 · 189 · 10971310.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109713 ↗
7. Environ. Technol. Innovation · 2022 · 27 · 10271510.1016/j.eti.2022.102715 ↗
8. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2022 · 196 · 11010710.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110107 ↗
9. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2017 · 130 · 30610.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.015 ↗
10. LWT--Food Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 163 · 11353110.1016/j.lwt.2022.113531 ↗
11. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B · 1997 · 124 · 12010.1016/s0168-583x(97)00070-0 ↗
12. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2021 · 92 · 10330210.1063/5.0056382 ↗
13. 2009 · 2551
14. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2020 · 177 · 10912910.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109129 ↗
15. J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2013 · 63 · 135110.3938/jkps.63.1351 ↗
16. Chin. Phys. C · 2014 · 38 · 10700810.1088/1674-1137/38/10/107008 ↗
17. 2016 · 541