Generative adversarial networks with physical evaluators for spray simulation of pintle injector
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the adjustable geometry, pintle injectors are especially suitable for liquid rocket engines, which require a widely throttleable range. However, applying the conventional computational fluid dynamics approaches to simulate the complex spray phenomenon in the whole range still remains a great challenge. In this paper, a novel deep learning approach used to simulate instantaneous spray fields under continuous operating conditions is explored. Based on one specific type of neural network and the idea of physics constraint, a Generative Adversarial Networks with Physics Evaluators framework is proposed. The geometry design and mass flux information are embedded as inputs. After the adversarial training between the generator and discriminator, the generated field solutions are fed into two physics evaluators. In this framework, a mass conversation evaluator is designed to improve the training robustness and convergence. A spray angle evaluator, which is composed of a down-sampling Convolutional Neural Network and theoretical model, guides the networks to generate the spray solutions more closely according to the injection conditions. The characterization of the simulated spray, including the spray morphology, droplet distribution, and spray angle, is well predicted. This work suggests great potential for prior physics knowledge employment in the simulation of instantaneous flow fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and flame dynamics · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Aerospace and Geodesy, Technical University of Munich 1 , 85748 Garching, Germany
Key Laboratory for Liquid Rocket Engine Technology, Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute 2 , 710100 Xi’an, China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Munich 3 , 85748 Garching, Germany
Funding
China Scholarship Council · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. TRW pintle engine heritage and performance characteristics
2. Pintle injectors10.1007/978-1-4419-7264-4_28 ↗
3. Performance evaluation of rocket engine combustors using ethanol/liquid oxygen pintle injector
4. Apollo experience report: Descent propulsion system
5. The SpaceX Falcon 1 launch vehicle flight 3 results, future developments, and Falcon 9 evolution
6. Liquid-propellant rocket engine throttling: A comprehensive review10.2514/1.49791 ↗
7. Lagrangian approach to axisymmetric spray simulation of pintle injector for liquid rocket engines10.1615/atomizspr.2018022652 ↗
8. Verification on spray simulation of a pintle injector for liquid rocket engine10.1007/s11630-016-0838-y ↗
9. Numerical study on the combustion characteristics of a fuel-centered pintle injector for methane rocket engines10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.02.005 ↗
10. Flowfield reconstruction method using artificial neural network10.2514/1.j057108 ↗
11. Supervised learning mixing characteristics of film cooling in a rocket combustor using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.021 ↗
12. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
13. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
14. A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning10.1016/j.jcp.2015.11.012 ↗
15. Turbulence modeling in the age of data10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 ↗
16. Prediction model of velocity field around circular cylinder over various Reynolds numbers by fusion convolutional neural networks based on pressure on the cylinder10.1063/1.5024595 ↗
17. Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach10.1063/1.5094943 ↗
18. A novel method of low-dimensional representation for temporal behavior of flow fields using deep autoencoder10.1063/1.5067313 ↗
19. A. B. Farimani, J. Gomes, and V. S. Pande, “Deep learning the physics of transport phenomena,” arXiv:1709.02432 (2017).
20. M. D. Ribeiro, A. Rehman, S. Ahmed, and A. Dengel, “DeepCFD: Efficient steady-state laminar flow approximation with deep convolutional neural networks,” arXiv:2004.08826 (2020).
21. Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of airfoil flows10.2514/1.j058291 ↗
22. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
23. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
24. P. Holl, V. Koltun, and N. Thuerey, “Learning to control PDEs with differentiable physics,” arXiv:2001.07457 (2020).
25. Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732 ↗
26. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations10.1137/19m1274067 ↗
27. H. Ma, X. Hu, Y. Zhang, N. Thuerey, and O. J. Haidn, “A combined data-driven and physics-driven method for steady heat conduction prediction using deep convolutional neural networks,” arXiv:2005.08119 (2020).
28. Generative adversarial netowrks
29. Deep unsupervised learning of turbulence for inflow generation at various Reynolds numbers10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109216 ↗
30. Enforcing statistical constraints in generative adversarial networks for modeling chaotic dynamical systems10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109209 ↗
31. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks
32. Combustion characteristics of ethanol/liquid-oxygen rocket-engine combustor with planar pintle injector10.2514/1.b36144 ↗
33. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
34. A survey of convolutional neural networks: Analysis, applications, and prospects
35. A survey of the recent architectures of deep convolutional neural networks10.1007/s10462-020-09825-6 ↗
36. Least squares generative adversarial networks
37. T. Karras, T. Aila, S. Laine, and J. Lehtinen, “Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation,” arXiv:1710.10196 (2017).
38. M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv:1411.1784 (2014).
39. PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
40. Breakup processes of liquid jets in subsonic crossflows10.2514/2.5151 ↗
41. Spray cone formation from pintle-type injector systems in liquid rocket engines
42. Development and validation of deep learning algorithms for scoliosis screening using back images10.1038/s42003-019-0635-8 ↗
43. 2020
44. Automated comprehensive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis assessment using mvc-net10.1016/j.media.2018.05.005 ↗
45. tempoGAN: A temporally coherent, volumetric GAN for super-resolution fluid flow10.1145/3197517.3201304 ↗
46. M. Luo, “Experimental and numerical study of cryogenic flashing spray in spacecraft application,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München, 2018.
47. Temperature and size measurements of cryogenic spray droplets with global rainbow refractometry10.2514/1.b36750 ↗