The characteristic analysis of a nuclear magnetic resonance oscillator coupled with the phase-locked loop
Source abstract
Abstract
We analyze the scale factor linearity, steady-state, transient, and noise characteristics of a nuclear magnetic resonance oscillator coupled with the phase-locked loop, which makes its performance improvement possible by a balanced strategy in optimizing parameters based on the proposed model. The numerical simulation indicates that the simple oscillator system gives a better scale factor linearity and transient response than the coupled system, while the steady-state solution is similar between the two with experimental validation. The phase and magnetic noise suppression is necessary to ensure the dynamic response of the coupled system. The characteristic analysis not only facilitates the rapid-response optimization of the coupled oscillator system under a dynamic environment but also enlightens corresponding steady-state tracking precision.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research · Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology 1 , Changsha 410073, China
Interdisciplinary Center of Quantum Information, National University of Defense Technology 2 , Changsha 410073, China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 31310.1038/nnano.2014.313 ↗
2. J. Magn. Reson. · 2010 · 206 · 7410.1016/j.jmr.2010.06.006 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Express · 2014 · 7 · 06300410.7567/apex.7.063004 ↗
4. J. Magn. Reson. · 2000 · 147 · 29610.1006/jmre.2000.2179 ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 29910.1038/nnano.2014.299 ↗
6. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging · 2000 · 11 · 60710.1002/1522-2586(200006)11:6<607::aid-jmri6>3.0.co;2-7 ↗
7. Nat. Phys. · 2013 · 9 · 254310.1038/nphys2543 ↗
8. Gyroscopy Navig. · 2014 · 5 · 7510.1134/s2075108714020060 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 23080110.1103/physrevlett.95.230801 ↗
10. Sensors · 2012 · 12 · 633110.3390/s120506331 ↗
11. IEEE Sens. J. · 2011 · 11 · 174910.1109/jsen.2011.2157679 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 12300110.1103/physrevlett.94.123001 ↗
13. 2010 · 4910.1002/9783527629503.ch5 ↗
14. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1997 · 69 · 62910.1103/revmodphys.69.629 ↗
15. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 294 · 01200110.1088/1742-6596/294/1/012001 ↗
16. 2005 · 6510.1002/0471732699.ch4 ↗
17. Adv. At., Mol., Opt. Phys. · 2016 · 65 · 37310.1016/bs.aamop.2016.04.002 ↗
18. AIP Adv. · 2019 · 9 · 04511710.1063/1.5082152 ↗