journal article·2018-03-01Open access

A composite approach boosts transduction coefficients of piezoceramics for energy harvesting

Xiaole Yu, Yudong Hou, Mupeng Zheng, Haiyan Zhao, Mankang Zhu

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

Piezoelectric energy harvesting is a hotspot in the field of new energy, the core goal of which is to prepare piezoceramics with a high transduction coefficient (d33×g33). The traditional solid–solution design strategy usually causes the same variation trend of d33 and εr, resulting in a low d33×g33 value. In this work, a composite design strategy was proposed that uses PZN–PZT/ZnAl2O4 as an example. By introducing ZnAl2O4, which is nonferroelectric with low εr, to the PZN–PZT piezoelectric matrix, εr decreased rapidly while d33 remained relatively stable. This behavior was ascribed to the increase of Q33 caused by an interfacial effect facilitating the formation of micro-domain structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Technology , Beijing 100124, China

Funding

Beijing Municipal High Level Innovative Team Building Program · Jing-Hua Talents Project of Beijing Unversity of Technology · Natural Science Fundation of Beijing · Ri-Xin Talents Project of Beijng University ofTechnology · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Electroceram. · 2007 · 19 · 165
2. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2007 · 16 · R110.1088/0964-1726/16/3/r01 ↗
3. Sensors · 2009 · 9 · 636210.3390/s90806362 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferr. · 2010 · 57 · 261010.1109/tuffc.2010.1734 ↗
5. Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 148910.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.026 ↗
6. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 96 · 248610.1111/jace.12334 ↗
7. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 26 · 319710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.005 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2014 · 1 · 01110310.1063/1.4861260 ↗
9. Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 661510.1038/ncomms7615 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 23290410.1063/1.4922494 ↗
11. Dalton Trans. · 2016 · 45 · 1089110.1039/c6dt01880g ↗
12. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2015 · 98 · 393510.1111/jace.13831 ↗
13. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2015 · 98 · 392510.1111/jace.13849 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 394110.1063/1.1505669 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 04290210.1063/1.2837621 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 12290810.1063/1.2784202 ↗
17. Ceram. Int. · 2012 · 38 · 496710.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.091 ↗
18. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2004 · 41 · 30110.1140/epjb/e2004-00321-8 ↗
19. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 33 · 144710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.12.025 ↗
20. Metall. Mater. Trans. B · 2004 · 35 · 63310.1007/s11663-004-0004-x ↗
21. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 1987 · 66 · 704
22. Ceram. Int. · 2007 · 33 · 101910.1016/j.ceramint.2006.03.001 ↗
23. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2013 · 33 · 176910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.02.014 ↗
24. J. Electroceram. · 2007 · 19 · 11310.1007/s10832-007-9047-0 ↗
25. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. · 2015 · 7 · 2033210.1021/acsami.5b06033 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 12411110.1063/1.4945108 ↗
27. MRS Bull. · 2014 · 51 · 42610.1016/j.materresbull.2013.12.061 ↗
28. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 38 · 58510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.09.001 ↗
29. J. Mater. Sci. · 1990 · 25 · 265510.1007/bf00584864 ↗
30. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 11411310.1063/1.2930883 ↗
31. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 23290410.1063/1.4953457 ↗
32. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 36 · 340110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.05.044 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 20760110.1103/physrevlett.103.207601 ↗
34. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2017 · 100 · 521110.1111/jace.15054 ↗