journal article·2018-01-01Open access

Spin Seebeck effect in a metal-single-molecule-magnet-metal junction

Pengbin Niu, Lixiang Liu, Xiaoqiang Su, Lijuan Dong, Hong-Gang Luo

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

We investigate the nonlinear regime of temperature-driven spin-related currents through a single molecular magnet (SMM), which is connected with two metal electrodes. Under a large spin approximation, the SMM is simplified to a natural two-channel model possessing spin-opposite configuration and Coulomb interaction. We find that in temperature-driven case the system can generate spin-polarized currents. More interestingly, at electron-hole symmetry point, the competition of the two channels induces a temperature-driven pure spin current. This device demonstrates that temperature-driven SMM junction shows some results different from the usual quantum dot model, which may be useful in the future design of thermal-based molecular spintronic devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Magnetism in coordination complexes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Solid State Physics and Department of Physics, Shanxi Datong University 1 , Datong 037009, China

Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Lanzhou University 2 , Lanzhou 730000, China and , Beijing 100084, China

Beijing Computational Science Research Center 2 , Lanzhou 730000, China and , Beijing 100084, China

Funding

Shanxi Provincial applicable fundamental research Foundation · Shanxi Provincial Scientific and Technological Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature (London) · 2008 · 455 · 77810.1038/nature07321 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 09442710.1103/physrevb.88.094427 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 21440710.1103/physrevb.89.214407 ↗
4. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 89810.1038/nmat2860 ↗
5. Nature (London) · 2011 · 475 · 8210.1038/nature10224 ↗
6. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 89410.1038/nmat2856 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 17250510.1063/1.3507386 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 06720610.1103/physrevlett.110.067206 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 06720710.1103/physrevlett.110.067207 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 18660210.1103/physrevlett.114.186602 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 11543310.1103/physrevb.94.115433 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 05444810.1103/physrevb.76.054448 ↗
13. Nature Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 17910.1038/nmat2133 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 22442010.1103/physrevb.79.224420 ↗
15. EPL · 2010 · 89 · 1800310.1209/0295-5075/89/18003 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 12660210.1103/physrevlett.106.126602 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 24210110.1063/1.3525571 ↗
18. Nature (London) · 1996 · 383 · 14510.1038/383145a0 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 05720210.1103/physrevlett.105.057202 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 23530410.1103/physrevb.73.235304 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 23530510.1103/physrevb.73.235304 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 19534110.1103/physrevb.75.195341 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 251210.1103/physrevlett.68.2512 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 260110.1103/physrevlett.70.2601 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 11531310.1103/physrevb.90.115313 ↗
26. Phys. Lett. A · 2012 · 376 · 148110.1016/j.physleta.2012.03.007 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 23530610.1103/physrevb.71.235306 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 08210210.1063/1.3327807 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 20531210.1103/physrevb.69.205312 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 75 · 12530110.1103/physrevb.75.125301 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 19540910.1103/physrevb.80.195409 ↗