Explorations on size limit of L1-FePt nanoparticles for practical magnetic storage
Source abstract
Abstract
With the advance of HAMR technology, the storage potential of L10-FePt nanoparticles with practical considerations are of great significance. We present an L10-FePt nanoparticle model based on atomistic spin model with Langevin thermodynamics to simulate the magnetic behaviors of L10-FePt nanoparticles at Curie temperature and room temperature to explore their practical design margins. Given specific composites, the Curie temperatures of L10-FePt nanoparticles decrease with their volume sizes decrease starting from 8 nm, meaning no more laser power increment needed for smaller L10-FePt nanoparticles. However, L10-FePt nanoparticles get unstable more easily while their volume sizes decrease at room temperature within 10 years. Above all, a reasonable size of L10-FePt nanoparticles for stable information retaining should not be less than 8 nm at a certain aspect ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Semiconductor materials and devices · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Huazhong University of Science and Technology 1 Wuhan National Laboratory of Optoelectronics, , Wuhan 430074, China
Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2 School of Optical and Electronic Information, , Wuhan 430074, China
Funding
Science Technology Support Program of Hubei Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on · 2013 · 49 · 77910.1109/TMAG.2012.2219513 ↗
2. Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on · 2014 · 50 · 110.1109/TMAG.2013.2281027 ↗
3. Proceedings of the IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 181010.1109/JPROC.2008.2004315 ↗
4. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 100 · 10240210.1063/1.3691196 ↗
5. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · 2014 · 26 · 10320210.1088/0953-8984/26/10/103202 ↗
6. Reports on Progress in Physics · 1997 · 60 · 48710.1088/0034-4885/60/5/001 ↗
7. Proceedings of the IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 184710.1109/jproc.2008.2004318 ↗
8. Physical Review B · 2005 · 71 · 13441110.1103/PhysRevB.71.134411 ↗
9. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2007 · 310 · 184410.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.625 ↗
10. EPL (Europhysics Letters) · 2005 · 69 · 80510.1209/epl/i2004-10404-2 ↗
11. Physical Review B · 1998 · 58 · 1493710.1103/PhysRevB.58.14937 ↗
12. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 101 · 05240610.1063/1.4740075 ↗
13. Physica Status Solidi (A) · 2013 · 210 · 124510.1002/pssa.201329106 ↗
14. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 104 · 22240310.1063/1.4880655 ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2011 · 109 · 07B70310.1063/1.3536794 ↗
16. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 9810.1063/1.3574538 ↗
17. Applied Physics Letters · 2010 · 97 · 190810.1063/1.3522652 ↗