journal article·2017-08-01Open access

A selection rule for transitions in PT-symmetric quantum theory

Lawrence R. Mead, David Garfinkle

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

Carl Bender and collaborators have developed a quantum theory governed by Hamiltonians that are PT-symmetric rather than Hermitian. To implement this theory, the inner product was redefined to guarantee positive norms of eigenstates of the Hamiltonian. In the general case, which includes arbitrary time-dependence in the Hamiltonian, a modification of the Schrödinger equation is necessary as shown by Gong and Wang to conserve probability. In this paper, we derive the following selection rule: transitions induced by time dependence in a PT-symmetric Hamiltonian cannot occur between normalized states of differing PT-norm. We show three examples of this selection rule in action: two matrix models and one in the continuum.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems · Topological Materials and Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern Mississippi 1 , Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA

Dept. of Physics, Oakland University 2 , Rochester Hills, MI 48309 and , Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120, USA

Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics, Randall Laboratory of Physics, University of Michigan 2 , Rochester Hills, MI 48309 and , Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 27040110.1103/physrevlett.89.270401 ↗
2. Rept. Prog. Theo. Phys. · 2007 · 70 · 94710.5040/9781474225243.ch-006 ↗
3. J. Phys. A · 2016 · 40 · 2201
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 03040210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030402 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 103 · 093902
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 05390110.1103/physrevlett.105.053901 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 82 · 03180110.1103/PhysRevA.82.031801 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 09390210.1103/physrevlett.106.093902 ↗
9. J. Phys. A · 2004 · 37 · 1013910.1088/0305-4470/37/43/009 ↗
10. Phys. Lett. A · 2004 · 10210.1016/j.physleta.2004.05.063 ↗
11. J. Phys. A · 2013 · 46 · 48530210.1088/1751-8113/46/48/485302 ↗
12. Contemp. Phys. · 2005 · 46 · 27710.1080/00107500072632 ↗
13. Am. J. Phys. · 2003 · 109510.1119/1.1574043 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. A · 2010 · 82 · 01210310.1103/physreva.82.012103 ↗
15. Annales Henri Poincare · 2005 · 16 · 99
16. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. · 2014 · 57 · 183510.1007/s11433-014-5505-2 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 2013 · 87 · 02211910.1103/physreva.87.022119 ↗
18. Phys. Lett. B · 2007 · 208
19. Phys. Rev. D · 2008 · 78 · 08500310.1103/physrevd.78.085003 ↗
20. Euro. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 71 · 16610.1209/epl/i2005-10073-7 ↗