journal article·2019-03-01Open access

Semi-hard magnetic nanocomposites based on out-of-equilibrium Fe2+δNb and Fe2+δTa Laves phases

A. M. Gabay, G. C. Hadjipanayis

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

Melt-spun Fe100-xNbx and Fe100-xTax alloys consisting of a hexagonal (C14) Laves phase and an iron-based bcc phase were found to exhibit room-temperature coercivities up to 0.45 and 0.48 kOe, respectively. The non-equilibrium C14 structures in the melt-spun alloys are characterized by a smaller unit cell volume, a higher Curie temperature and, presumably, a greater concentration of Fe compared to the C14 structures in the alloys annealed at 1533 K. The room-temperature coercivity, which correlates with the C14 lattice contraction, is believed to be caused by the magnetocrystalline anisotropy of the non-equilibrium Laves phase with the latter being magnetically coupled with the Fe phase via an intergranular exchange interaction. On the other hand, a coercivity of around 0.3 kOe persists in the melt-spun alloys above the Curie temperature of the C14 phase. This high-temperature coercivity may originate from the shape or strain anisotropy of the Fe phase particles. The energy density of the reported two-phase alloys is not sufficiently high to consider them potential hard magnetic materials. However, the pure non-equilibrium Fe2+δNb and Fe2+δTa compounds may be of interest if they can be isolated and textured.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware , Newark, Delaware 19716, USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26 · 06420910.1088/0953-8984/26/6/064209 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17A76910.1063/1.4868696 ↗
3. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2017 · 1700184
4. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2017 · 1700221
5. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 05620410.1063/1.5006488 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 06442210.1103/physrevb.96.064422 ↗
7. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. · 2011 · 32 · 9710.1007/s11669-010-9808-3 ↗
8. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. · 2013 · 34 · 16510.1007/s11669-012-0164-3 ↗
9. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 316 · e49210.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.197 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 22441010.1103/physrevb.79.224410 ↗
11. J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1970 · 29 · 109410.1143/jpsj.29.1094 ↗
12. J. Phys.: Conf. Series · 2010 · 200 · 03207810.1088/1742-6596/200/3/032078 ↗
13. J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2016 · 85 · 08470710.7566/jpsj.85.084707 ↗
14. Physica B · 1977 · 86-88 · 6610.1016/0378-4363(77)90228-5 ↗
15. J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1987 · 56 · 404010.1143/jpsj.56.4040 ↗
16. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1995 · 140-144 · 7110.1016/0304-8853(94)00837-x ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 11513710.1103/physrevb.85.115137 ↗
18. Physica B · 1997 · 237-238 · 49310.1016/s0921-4526(97)00179-8 ↗
19. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2018 · 454 · 38610.1016/j.jmmm.2018.01.055 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1989 · 25 · 388110.1109/20.42466 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1991 · 27 · 503710.1109/20.278732 ↗
22. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1991 · 27 · 358810.1109/20.102931 ↗