On the optimization, and the intensity dependence, of the excitation rate for the absorption of two-photons due to the direct permanent dipole moment excitation mechanism
Source abstract
Abstract
A model two-level dipolar molecule, and the rotating wave approximation and perturbation theory, are used to investigate the optimization and the laser intensity dependence of the two-photon excitation rate via the direct permanent dipole mechanism. The rate is proportional to the square of the laser intensity I only for small intensities and times when perturbation theory is applicable. An improvement on perturbation theory is provided by a small time RWA result for the rate which is not proportional to I2; rather it is proportional to the square of an effective intensity Ieff. For each laser intensity the optimum RWA excitation rate as a function of time, for low intensities, is proportional to I, not I2, and for high intensities it is proportional to Ieff. For a given two-photon transition the laser-molecule coupling optimizes for an intensity Imax which, for example, leads to a maximum possible excitation rate as a function of time. The validity of the RWA results of this paper, and the importance of including the effects of virtual excited states, are also discussed briefly.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications · Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Western Ontario Department of Chemistry, , London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
Funding
none
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Ann. Phys. · 1931 · 9 · 27310.1002/andp.19314010303 ↗
2. J. Chem. Phys. · 1982 · 76 · 575510.1063/1.442971 ↗
3. J. Phys. B · 1984 · 17 · 76310.1088/0022-3700/17/5/017 ↗
4. J. Phys. B · 2006 · 39 · S60510.1088/0953-4075/39/15/S08 ↗
5. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2008 · 25 · 86510.1364/JOSAB.25.000865 ↗
6. J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139 · 14410410.1063/1.4824382 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. · 1937 · 51 · 65310.1103/PhysRev.51.652 ↗
8. Phys. Lett. A · 1985 · 108 · 34010.1016/0375-9601(85)90110-0 ↗
9. 1990
10. Phys. Rev. A · 1986 · 33 · 168810.1103/PhysRevA.33.1688 ↗
11. Phys. Rev.A · 1986 · 33 · 103310.1103/PhysRevA.33.1033 ↗
12. Abramowitz · 1964
13. Phys. Rev. · 1932 · 40 · 50210.1103/PhysRev.40.502 ↗
14. J. Phys. B · 1983 · 16 · 95110.1088/0022-3700/16/6/012 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. A · 2000 · 63 · 01340310.1103/PhysRevA.63.013403 ↗
16. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 150110.1063/1.481936 ↗
17. Chem. Phys. · 1998 · 228 · 11510.1016/S0301-0104(97)00323-6 ↗
18. 1992
19. 1985
20. 1974
21. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 137 · 31910.1016/0009-2614(87)80892-8 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. A · 1990 · 41 · 396010.1103/PhysRevA.41.3960 ↗
23. Molec. Phys. · 1991 · 74 · 11310.1080/00268979100102101 ↗
24. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2002 · 19 · 267310.1364/JOSAB.19.002673 ↗
25. Lim · 1977
26. Science · 1990 · 248 · 7310.1126/science.2321027 ↗
27. Diaspro · 2002
28. Photochem. Photobiol. · 2006 · 82 · 44310.1562/2005-08-24-RA-657 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. A · 1990 · 41 · 155610.1103/PhysRevA.41.1556 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 1965 · 138 · 97910.1103/PhysRev.138.B979 ↗
31. 1973 · 90
32. Molec. Phys. · 1985 · 56 · 19310.1080/00268978500102261 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. · 1940 · 57 · 52210.1103/PhysRev.57.522 ↗
34. Molec. Phys. · 1997 · 92 · 805
35. J. Phys. B · 2011 · 44 · 20540110.1088/0953-4075/44/20/205401 ↗
36. J. Appl. Physics · 1963 · 34 · 78310.1063/1.1729536 ↗
37. Adv. Chem. Phys. · 1982 · 50 · 395
38. Phys. Rev. A · 1984 · 29 · 118810.1103/PhysRevA.29.1188 ↗
39. J. Chem. Phys. · 1992 · 96 · 499110.1063/1.462742 ↗
40. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 258 · 29310.1016/0009-2614(96)00620-3 ↗
41. J. Phys. Chem. A · 2011 · 115 · 425510.1021/jp200129h ↗
42. Scientific Reports · 2014 · 4 · 444710.1038/srep04447 ↗
43. Compt. Ren. Chimie · 2016 · 19 · 2810.1016/j.crci.2015.07.011 ↗
44. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2015 · 44 · 503110.1039/C5CS00278H ↗