journal article·2011-12-01Open access

The effect of electrostatic shielding using invisibility cloak

Ruo-Yang Zhang, Qing Zhao, Mo-Lin Ge

AIP Advances· Volume 1· Issue 4

Abstract

The effect of electrostatic shielding for a spherical invisibility cloak with arbitrary charges inside is investigated. Our result reveals that the charge inside the cloak is a crucial factor to determine the detection. When charged bodies are placed inside the cloak with an arbitrary distribution, the electric fields outside are purely determined by the total charges just as the fields of a point charge at the center of the cloak. As the total charges reduce to zero, the bodies can not be detected. On the other hand, if the total charges are nonzero, the electrostatic potential inside an ideal cloak tends to infinity. For unideal cloaks, this embarrassment is overcome, while they still have good behaviors of shielding. In addition, the potential across the inner surface of an ideal cloak is discontinuous due to the infinite polarization of the dielectric, however it can be alternatively interpreted as the dual Meissner effect of a dual superconductive layer with a surface magnetic current.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis · Topological Materials and Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nankai University 1 Theoretical Physics Division, Chern Institute of Mathematics, , Tianjin, 300071, P.R. China

Beijing Institute of Technology 2 Department of Physics, College of Science, , Beijing, 100081, P.R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2006 · 312 · 178010.1126/science.1125907 ↗
2. Science · 2006 · 312 · 177710.1126/science.1126493 ↗
3. Physiol. Meas. · 2003 · 24 · 41310.1088/0967-3334/24/2/353 ↗
4. Math. Res. Lett. · 2003 · 10 · 68510.4310/MRL.2003.v10.n5.a11 ↗
5. Opt. Express · 2006 · 14 · 979410.1364/OE.14.009794 ↗
6. Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 1175310.1364/OE.17.011753 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 74 · 03662110.1103/PhysRevE.74.036621 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 06390310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063903 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 11390310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.113903 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 12110110.1103/PhysRevB.76.121101 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 12512710.1103/PhysRevB.77.125127 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 06390410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.063904 ↗
13. Commun. Math. Phys. · 2007 · 275 · 74910.1007/s00220-007-0311-6 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 24390110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.243901 ↗
15. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 07620810.1088/0953-8984/19/7/076208 ↗
16. 2005
17. R.-Y. Zhang, Q. Zhao, and M.-L. Ge, (2011), arXiv:1109.5133v1 [physics.optics].
18. 1978
19. 1999