journal article·2017-08-01Open access

Effect of total emitted electron velocity distribution function on the plasma sheath near a floating wall

Shaowei Qing, Zhou Hu

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

Electrons emitted from a solid surface can noticeably affect characteristics of plasma sheath surrounding that surface by modifying current balance at wall, charge separation in sheath region and Bohm criterion at sheath edge. We establish a static sheath model with kinetic electrons and cold ions to emphasize the effect of different total emitted electron velocity distribution functions (EEVDFs) on classic sheath solution and its structure transition. Four total EEVDFs with same average energy are considered separately. It is found that total EEVDFs influence the sheath solution and the threshold of total electron emission coefficient (EEC) for classic sheath dramatically, and can cause no solution for critical space-charge limited (SCL) sheath. These results indicate that, as EEC increases from zero gradually, the sheath will not transit from classic sheath to SCL sheath structure for some special total EEVDFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Chongqing University, Ministry of Education 1 , Chongqing 400044, Peoples Republic of China

Power Engineering Institute, Chongqing University 2 , Chongqing 400044, Peoples Republic of China

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universityies · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. · 1928 · 14 · 62710.1073/pnas.14.8.627 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. · 1929 · 34 · 87610.1103/physrev.34.876 ↗
3. Guthrie · 1949 · 77
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 24 · 49310.1088/0022-3727/24/4/001 ↗
5. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2013 · 55 · 09300110.1088/0741-3335/55/9/093001 ↗
6. Plasma Phys. · 1967 · 9 · 8510.1088/0032-1028/9/1/410 ↗
7. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 215110.1063/1.872888 ↗
8. Phys. Plasmas · 2005 · 12 · 05710410.1063/1.1891747 ↗
9. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 20 · 06300110.1088/0963-0252/20/6/063001 ↗
10. Phys. Plasmas · 2011 · 18 · 07350110.1063/1.3601354 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 14500410.1103/physrevlett.103.145004 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 11150110.1063/1.3564898 ↗
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 12250110.1063/1.4835295 ↗
14. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion · 2014 · 56 · 02500110.1088/0741-3335/56/2/025001 ↗
15. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 10290410.1063/1.3486523 ↗
16. Icarus · 2015 · 257 · 110.1016/j.icarus.2015.04.028 ↗
17. J. Geophys. Res. · 1998 · 103 · 660510.1029/97ja03523 ↗
18. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 09370410.1063/1.4896345 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 02211510.1063/1.4942416 ↗
20. Phys. Fluids B · 1993 · 5 · 63110.1063/1.860495 ↗
21. Contrib. Plasma Phys. · 2004 · 44 · 12610.1002/ctpp.200410017 ↗
22. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 08350110.1063/1.2749237 ↗
23. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 10350710.1063/1.4897321 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 05330210.1063/1.4974961 ↗
25. Plasma Phys. Rep. · 2004 · 30 · 29910.1134/1.1707151 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. E · 2013 · 88 · 03310310.1103/physreve.88.033103 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 08500310.1103/physrevlett.116.085003 ↗
28. Phys. Plasmas · 2014 · 21 · 06350210.1063/1.4882260 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 07500210.1103/physrevlett.111.075002 ↗
30. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 11 · 5710.1088/1009-0630/11/1/12 ↗
31. Phys. Plasmas · 2003 · 10 · 413710.1063/1.1611881 ↗
32. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beam · 2002 · 5 · 12440410.1103/physrevstab.5.124404 ↗
33. J. P. Sheehan, Doctor’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Published by ProQuest LLC (2012).