Exploration of the fragmentation of laser shock-melted aluminum using x-ray backlighting
Source abstract
Abstract
The fragmentation of shock-melted metal material is an important scientific problem in shock physics and is suitable for experimentally investigating by the laser-driven x-ray backlighting technique. This letter reports on the exploration of laser shock-melted aluminum fragmentation by means of x-ray backlighting at the SGII high energy facility in China. High-quality and high-resolution radiographs with negligible motion blur were obtained and these images enabled analysis of the mass distribution of the fragmentation product.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Fluid Physics National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, , CAEP, P.O. Box 919-102, Mianyang 621900, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 01350610.1063/1.2400800 ↗
2. Arch. Mech. · 2008 · 60 · 323
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 13191010.1063/1.2906907 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 18410710.1103/PhysRevB.79.184107 ↗
5. Int. J. Fract. · 2010 · 163 · 10910.1007/s10704-009-9378-8 ↗
6. Phys.Rev.Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 09550210.1103/PhysRevLett.104.095502 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 10410110.1063/1.4868103 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 04352510.1063/1.4863719 ↗
9. Phys.Rev.Lett. · 2015 · 114 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.114.115701 ↗
10. Phys.Rev.Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 310710.1103/PhysRevLett.71.3107 ↗
11. Phys.Rev.Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 249210.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2492 ↗
12. Phys.Rev.Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 345510.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3455 ↗
13. Int. J. Impact. Engng. · 1997 · 20 · 29310.1016/S0734-743X(97)87502-1 ↗
14. Int. J. Impact. Engng. · 2006 · 33 · 11910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.043 ↗
15. Int. J. Impact. Engng. · 2006 · 33 · 46310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.006 ↗
16. Int. J. Impact. Engng. · 2008 · 35 · 155710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.042 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 21190510.1063/1.3268437 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 17410210.1103/PhysRevB.82.174102 ↗
19. Int. J. Impact Engineering · 2010 · 37 · 88710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.03.001 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 18500410.1103/PhysRevLett.102.185004 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 04500510.1103/PhysRevLett.103.045005 ↗
22. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 10270310.1063/1.3486536 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 15500410.1103/PhysRevLett.109.155004 ↗
24. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 10E50110.1063/1.4728096 ↗
25. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 05630610.1063/1.4803083 ↗
26. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2014 · 85 · 11E50110.1063/1.4890215 ↗
27. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2001 · 72 · 62710.1063/1.1315641 ↗
28. Opt. Lett. · 2002 · 27 · 13410.1364/OL.27.000134 ↗
29. Appl. Opt. · 2005 · 44 · 85910.1364/AO.44.000859 ↗
30. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 10E91510.1063/1.2981173 ↗
31. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 05631410.1063/1.3363170 ↗
32. 1994
33. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 29 · 04620110.1088/0256-307X/29/4/046201 ↗