journal article·2014-06-01Open access

Waltzing of a helium pair in tungsten: Migration barrier and trajectory revealed from first-principles

J. G. Niu, Q. Zhan, W. T. Geng

AIP Advances· Volume 4· Issue 6

Abstract

Despite well documented first-principles theoretical determination of the low migration energy (0.06 eV) of a single He in tungsten, fully quantum mechanical calculations on the migration of a He pair still present a challenge due to the complexity of its trajectory. By identifying the six most stable configurations of the He pair in W and decomposing its motion into rotational, translational, and rotational-translational routines, we are able to determine its migration barrier and trajectory. Our density functional theory calculations demonstrate a He pair has three modes of motion: a close or open circular two-dimensional motion in (100) plane with an energy barrier of 0.30 eV, a snaking motion along [001] direction with a barrier of 0.30 eV, and a twisted-ladder motion along [010] direction with the two He swinging in the plane (100) and a barrier of 0.31 eV. The graceful associative movements of a He pair are related to the chemical-bonding-like He-He interaction being much stronger than its migration barrier in W. The excellent agreement with available experimental measurements (0.24–0.32 eV) on He migration makes our first-principles result a solid input to obtain accurate He-W interatomic potentials in molecular dynamics simulations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Science and Technology Beijing 1 School of Materials Science & Engineering, , Beijing 100083, China

Hebei University 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, , Baoding 071000, China

Psi Quantum Materials LLC 3 , Laiwu 271100, China

References (13)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2001 · 290–293 · 110.1016/S0022-3115(00)00623-1 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 561610.1103/PhysRevB.24.5616 ↗
3. J. Nucl. Mater. · 1982 · 105 · 27610.1016/0022-3115(82)90385-3 ↗
4. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2003 · 323 · 22910.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.001 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 19640210.1103/PhysRevLett.97.196402 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 1984 · 56 · 98310.1063/1.334039 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1979 · 42 · 51510.1103/PhysRevLett.42.515 ↗
8. W. Xiao, Z. X. Tian, and W. T. Geng, e-print arXiv:1201.1598 (2012).
9. J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 446 · 4910.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.034 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
13. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 113 · 990110.1063/1.1329672 ↗