journal article·2013-10-01Open access

Aperture-based antihydrogen gravity experiment: Parallel plate geometry

J. R. Rocha, R. M. Hedlof, C. A. Ordonez

AIP Advances· Volume 3· Issue 10

Abstract

An analytical model and a Monte Carlo simulation are presented of an experiment that could be used to determine the direction of the acceleration of antihydrogen due to gravity. The experiment would rely on methods developed by existing antihydrogen research collaborations. The configuration consists of two circular, parallel plates that have an axis of symmetry directed away from the center of the earth. The plates are separated by a small vertical distance, and include one or more pairs of circular barriers that protrude from the upper and lower plates, thereby forming an aperture between the plates. Antihydrogen annihilations that occur just beyond each barrier, within a “shadow” region, are asymmetric on the upper plate relative to the lower plate. The probability for such annihilations is determined for a point, line and spheroidal source of antihydrogen. The production of 100,000 antiatoms is predicted to be necessary for the aperture-based experiment to indicate the direction of free fall acceleration of antimatter, provided that antihydrogen is produced within a sufficiently small antiproton plasma at a temperature of 4 K.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Molecular Physics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Astro and Planetary Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of North Texas Department of Physics, , Denton, Texas 76203, USA

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Nature (London) · 2010 · 468 · 67310.1038/nature09610 ↗
2. Nature Physics · 2011 · 7 · 55810.1038/nphys2025 ↗
3. Physics of Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 04351010.1063/1.4801067 ↗
4. Nature Communications · 2013 · 4 · 178510.1038/ncomms2787 ↗
5. Physical Review Letters · 2011 · 106 · 07300210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.073002 ↗
6. Physical Review Letters · 2012 · 108 · 11300210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.113002 ↗
7. Physical Review A · 2013 · 87 · 02342210.1103/PhysRevA.87.023422 ↗
8. EPL (Europhysics Letters) · 2003 · 63 · 20710.1209/epl/i2003-00509-0 ↗
9. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 24340110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243401 ↗
10. AIP Conference Proceedings · 2013 · 1521 · 14410.1063/1.4796070 ↗
11. Classical and Quantum Gravity · 2012 · 29 · 18400810.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184008 ↗
12. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · 2008 · 41 · 19200110.1088/0953-4075/41/19/192001 ↗
13. Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics · 2005 · 50 · 15510.1016/S1049-250X(05)80009-6 ↗
14. Physics Reports · 1994 · 241 · 6510.1016/0370-1573(94)90081-7 ↗
15. Physics Reports · 2004 · 402 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.002 ↗
16. Physics of Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 233310.1063/1.1651487 ↗
17. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A · 2010 · 368 · 367110.1098/rsta.2010.0026 ↗
18. AIP Advances · 2012 · 2 · 01217610.1063/1.3698146 ↗
19. AIP Conference Proceedings · 2013 · 1525 · 10210.1063/1.4802299 ↗