Numerical evaluations of membrane poration by shockwave induced multiple nanobubble collapse in presence of electric fields for transport through cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Synergistic applications of an electric field combined with nanojet-based mechanical pressure, have recently been shown to help create larger pores and provide control of the aspect ratio in biological membranes. The nanojets are formed by the collapse of nanobubbles in the vicinity of biomembranes upon being subjected to external shockwaves. Here we analyze the effects produced by the collapse of multiple nanobubbles in the presence of an electric field. Our simulations, based on molecular dynamics, show that not only would multiple nanobubbles make it possible to create larger pores, but also increase the pore density on the surface of biological cells. Both aspects could aid in the transport of drugs and genes for bio-medical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Microbial Inactivation Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering Technology, Eastern Michigan University 1 , Ypsilanti, Michigan 48197, USA
College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology 2 , Shanghai 201418, China
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas Tech University 3 , Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 1754
2. 1849
3. EMBO J. · 1982 · 1 · 84110.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x ↗
4. C. R. Acad. Sci. III · 1991 · 313 · 613
5. Biochem. Pharmacol. · 1988 · 37 · 472710.1016/0006-2952(88)90344-9 ↗
6. Critical Reviews in Bio-Medical Engineering · 2010 · 38 · 25510.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v38.i3.20 ↗
7. Proc. IEEE · 2004 · 92 · 112210.1109/jproc.2004.829009 ↗
8. PLoS ONE · 2015 · 10 · e013436410.1371/journal.pone.0134364 ↗
9. Gastrointestinal Intervention · 2014 · 3 · 810.1016/j.gii.2014.02.002 ↗
10. Physiol. Meas. · 2004 · 25 · 107710.1088/0967-3334/25/4/023 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. · 2007 · 14 · 108810.1109/tdei.2007.4339468 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. · 2008 · 55 · 39110.1109/tbme.2007.912424 ↗
13. Radiology · 2011 · 258 · 35110.1148/radiol.10081634 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02370110.1063/1.3518472 ↗
15. Biophys. J. · 2000 · 79 · 182110.1016/s0006-3495(00)76432-0 ↗
16. Soft Matter · 2014 · 10 · 477810.1039/c4sm00407h ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1031110.1038/srep40781 ↗
18. Desalination · 2015 · 357 · 7710.1016/j.desal.2014.11.011 ↗
19. J. Water Health · 2004 · 2 · 26710.2166/wh.2004.0024 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control · 2013 · 60 · 2110.1109/tuffc.2013.2534 ↗
21. J. Controlled Release · 2015 · 197 · 2010.1016/j.jconrel.2014.10.031 ↗
22. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. · 2008 · 60 · 115310.1016/j.addr.2008.03.005 ↗
23. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2015 · 119 · 622510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b02218 ↗
24. J. Phys. D · 2018 · 51 · 28540310.1088/1361-6463/aaca7a ↗
25. J. Membrane Biol. · 2016 · 249 · 67710.1007/s00232-016-9911-4 ↗
26. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 1995 · 91 · 4310.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-e ↗
27. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. · 2003 · 349 · 64310.1016/j.bbrc.2006.08.097 ↗
28. Hum. Gene Ther. · 2002 · 13 · 207910.1089/10430340260395929 ↗
29. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering · 2009 · 56 · 161710.1109/tbme.2009.2015459 ↗
30. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1251910.1021/jp035035a ↗
31. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects · 2003 · 214 · 20510.1016/s0927-7757(02)00410-7 ↗
32. Journ. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 03470110.1063/1.4994310 ↗