journal article·2018-10-01Open access

Highly sensitive detection of photo-thermal transient stress by a sub-nanosecond pump probe with surface plasmon resonance

Hayato Ichihashi, Hiromichi Hayashi, Shinji Takayanagi, Mami Matsukawa, Yoshiaki Watanabe

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 10

Abstract

Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) has attracted increasing attention for non-invasive functional imaging in biomedicine and biomedical studies. The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor is a potential acoustical detector with high sensitivity and wide bandwidth for use in high-resolution 3D PAM. In this study, we investigated a simple Kretschmann SPR sensor, demonstrating highly sensitive stress detection in the sub-nanosecond timescale by directly inducing photo-thermal transient stress. To do this, we designed and used a sub-nanosecond pump probe system. The SPR sensor clearly detected the transient response from the thermal elastic effect, while a simple pump-probe sensor without SPR did not detect it. Our experimental results demonstrate a simple SPR sensor that can detect stress with high sensitivity and sub-nanosecond time resolution. This technique could be used in high-resolution 3D PAM by mounting a small biomedical sample on the sensor.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Doshisha University 1 , 1-3 Tatara-Miyakodani, Kyotanabe, Kyoto 610-0321, Japan

Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology 2 , Nagoya 466-8555, Japan

Graduate School of Life and Medical Sciences, Doshisha University 3 , 1-3 Tatara-Miyakodani, Kyotanabe, Kyoto 610-0321, Japan

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 10 · 11140310.3788/col201210.111403 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 08491110.1063/1.2910897 ↗
3. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2003 · 74 · 40010.1063/1.1517187 ↗
4. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2008 · 79 · 11490210.1063/1.3006335 ↗
5. Phys. B Condens. Matter · 1996 · 219
6. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferr. Freq. Contr. · 2016 · 63 · 5
7. 1990
8. Interface Focus · 2011 · 1 · 60210.1098/rsfs.2011.0028 ↗
9. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2006 · 77 · 04110110.1063/1.2195024 ↗
10. Phys. Med. Biol. · 2009 · 54 · R5910.1088/0031-9155/54/19/r01 ↗
11. J. Opt. · 2016 · 18 · 07400610.1088/2040-8978/18/7/074006 ↗
12. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2011 · 82 · 09490310.1063/1.3632117 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 03370110.1063/1.4974326 ↗
14. Opt. Express · 2007 · 15 · 10
15. Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 235110.1002/adma.201300314 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 15370210.1063/1.4933333 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 60 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 13
19. Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 10
20. Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 146810.1038/ncomms2480 ↗
21. Opt. Lett. · 2007 · 32 · 6
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 10
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 6
24. Ultrasonics · 2015 · 56 · 2110.1016/j.ultras.2014.06.004 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 13420410.1103/physrevb.78.134204 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 11
27. J. Chemometrics · 2009 · 23 · 18810.1002/cem.1220 ↗
28. J. Chem. Phys. · 1999 · 111 · 23
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 60 · 110.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1 ↗