journal article·2018-05-01Open access

Performance investigation on DCSFCL considering different magnetic materials

Jiaxin Yuan, Hang Zhou, Yongheng Zhong, Pengcheng Gan, Yanhui Gao, Kazuhiro Muramatsu, Zhiye Du, Baichao Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 5

Abstract

In order to protect high voltage direct current (HVDC) system from destructive consequences caused by fault current, a novel concept of HVDC system fault current limiter (DCSFCL) was proposed previously. Since DCSFCL is based on saturable core reactor theory, iron core becomes the key to the final performance of it. Therefore, three typical kinds of soft magnetic materials were chosen to find out their impact on performances of DCSFCL. Different characteristics of materials were compared and their theoretical deductions were carried out, too. In the meanwhile, 3D models applying those three materials were built separately and finite element analysis simulations were performed to compare these results and further verify the assumptions. It turns out that materials with large saturation flux density value Bs like silicon steel and short demagnetization time like ferrite might be the best choice for DCSFCL, which can be a future research direction of magnetic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: HVDC Systems and Fault Protection · High-Voltage Power Transmission Systems · Electrical Fault Detection and Protection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Engineering, Wuhan University 1 , Wuhan 430072, China

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Saga University 2 , Saga 840-8502, Japan

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Hubei Province Science and Technology Support Program · Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. High Voltage · 2017 · 2 · 110.1049/hve.2017.0010 ↗
2. 2013
3. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine · 2012 · 10 · 1810.1109/mpe.2012.2213011 ↗
4. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2009 · 24 · 59210.1109/tpel.2008.2008441 ↗
5. IEEE Power Engineering Review · 2000 · 20 · 1010.1109/mper.2000.819913 ↗
6. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2007 · 22 · 3710.1109/tec.2006.889624 ↗
7. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2015 · 30 · 3710.1109/tpel.2014.2309937 ↗
8. Journal of Applied Physics · 1978 · 49 · 254610.1063/1.325061 ↗
9. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2005 · 15 · 213010.1109/tasc.2005.849471 ↗
10. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 1993 · 8 · 179610.1109/61.248287 ↗
11. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2012 · 27 · 277010.1109/tpel.2011.2174804 ↗
12. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2012 · 28 · 45010.1109/tpwrd.2012.2214404 ↗
13. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2017 · 32 · 104910.1109/tpwrd.2016.2601141 ↗
14. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2017 · 5310.1109/tmag.2017.2669358 ↗
15. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2015 · 51 · 110.1109/tmag.2015.2440427 ↗
16. AIP Advances · 2017 · 7 · 05623710.1063/1.4978699 ↗
17. 20 -24 2015 · 3914