Copper dusting effects on perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in Pt/Co/Pt tri-layers
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of Cu dusting on perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of sputter grown Pt/Co/Pt stack in which the Cu layer is in proximity with that of Co is investigated in this work. We used magneto optic Kerr effect microscopy measurements to study the variation in the reversal mechanisms in films with Co thicknesses below 0.8nm by systematically varying their perpendicular magnetic anisotropy using controlled Cu dusting. Cu dusting was done separately above and below the cobalt layer in order to understand the role of bottom and top Pt layers in magnetization reversal mechanisms of sputtered Pt/Co/Pt stack. The introduction of even 0.3nm thick Cu layer below the cobalt layer drastically affected the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy as evident from the nucleation behavior. On the contrary, even a 4nm thick top Cu layer had little effect on the reversal mechanism. These observations along with magnetization data was used to estimate the role of top and bottom Pt in the origin of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy as well as magnetization switching mechanism in Pt/Co/Pt thin films. Also, with an increase in the bottom Cu dusting from 0.2 to 0.4nm there was an increase in the number of nucleation sites resulting in the transformation of domain wall patterns from a smooth interface type to a finger like one and finally to maze type.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Science Department of Physics, , Bangalore, 560012, India
Funding
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology · Council of Scientific and Industrial Research · University Grants Commission
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 63 · 506610.1063/1.340404 ↗
2. Reports Prog. Phys. · 1999 · 59 · 140910.1088/0034-4885/59/11/002 ↗
3. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
4. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 54810.1038/nnano.2014.94 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 110.1016/j.physletb.2012.06.062 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 14040310.1103/PhysRevB.78.140403 ↗
7. Science. · 2015 · 349 · 28310.1126/science.aaa1442 ↗
8. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1485810.1038/srep14858 ↗
9. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 300050410.1109/LMAG.2011.2174032 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 17443310.1103/PhysRevB.75.174433 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 1410.1103/PhysRevLett.98.117204 ↗
12. Nature · 2003 · 422 · 70110.1038/nature01538 ↗
13. Science. · 2000 · 289 · 93010.1126/science.289.5481.930 ↗
14. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4944514 for saturation magnetisation and anisotrpic field data.
15. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 202 · 32110.1016/S0304-8853(99)00369-8 ↗
16. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 48500310.1088/0022-3727/46/48/485003 ↗