Classical trajectory Monte Carlo simulations of particle confinement using dual levitated coils
Source abstract
Abstract
The particle confinement properties of plasma confinement systems that employ dual levitated magnetic coils are investigated using classical trajectory Monte Carlo simulations. Two model systems are examined. In one, two identical current-carrying loops are coaxial and separated axially. In the second, two concentric and coplanar loops have different radii and carry equal currents. In both systems, a magnetic null circle is present between the current loops. Simulations are carried out for seven current loop separations for each system and at numerous values of magnetic field strength. Particle confinement is investigated at three locations between the loops at different distances from the magnetic null circle. Each simulated particle that did not escape the system exhibited one of four modes of confinement. Reduced results are given for both systems as the lowest magnetic field strength that exhibits complete confinement of all simulated particles for a particular loop separation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Molecular Physics · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Magnetic confinement fusion research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of North Texas Department of Physics, , Denton, Texas 76203, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Nucl. Fusion · 1973 · 13 · 43310.1088/0029-5515/13/3/015 ↗
2. Phys. Fluids · 1968 · 11 · 277710.1063/1.1691895 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 1985 · 25 · 117910.1088/0029-5515/25/9/031 ↗
4. Nucl. Fusion · 1985 · 25 · 111310.1088/0029-5515/25/9/022 ↗
5. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2006 · 81 · 237110.1016/j.fusengdes.2006.07.002 ↗
6. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 06303410.1088/0029-5515/51/6/063034 ↗
7. Phys. Plasmas · 2010 · 17 · 11211110.1063/1.3514207 ↗
8. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2013 · 1525 · 9710.1063/1.4802298 ↗
9. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 33 · L4310.1143/JJAP.33.L43 ↗
10. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 34 · 421310.1143/JJAP.34.4213 ↗
11. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2013 · 1525 · 10610.1063/1.4802300 ↗
12. Probl. of Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 17 · 35
13. Plasma Phys. Rep. · 2007 · 33 · 53510.1134/S1063780X07070021 ↗
14. AIP Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 10212910.1063/1.4827498 ↗
15. AIP Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 01217610.1063/1.3698146 ↗
16. Nature · 2010 · 468 · 67310.1038/nature09610 ↗
17. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 04351010.1063/1.4801067 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 11300210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.113002 ↗
19. Phys. Plasmas · 2007 · 14 · 10211110.1063/1.2778420 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 03210810.1063/1.2899306 ↗
21. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1441 · 54610.1063/1.3700612 ↗
22. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B · 2008 · 266 · 35110.1016/j.nimb.2007.12.010 ↗
23. AIP Conf. Proc. · 2013 · 1521 · 14410.1063/1.4796070 ↗
24. Class. Quantum Grav. · 2012 · 29 · 18400810.1088/0264-9381/29/18/184008 ↗
25. Nature · 2002 · 419 · 45610.1038/nature01096 ↗
26. Phys. Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 08350410.1063/1.2975362 ↗
27. Phys. Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 328910.1063/1.1494822 ↗