journal article·2012-03-01Open access

Simulation of an aperture-based antihydrogen gravity experiment

C. A. Ordonez, R. M. Hedlof

AIP Advances· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

A Monte Carlo simulation is presented of an experiment that could potentially determine whether antihydrogen accelerates vertically up or down as a result of earth's gravity. The experiment would rely on methods developed by existing antihydrogen research collaborations and would employ a Penning trap for the production of antihydrogen within a uniform magnetic field. The axis of symmetry of the cylindrical trap wall would be oriented horizontally, and an axisymmetric aperture (with an inner radius that is smaller than the cylindrical trap wall radius) would be present a short distance away from the antihydrogen production region. Antihydrogen annihilations that occur along the cylindrical trap wall would be detected by the experiment. The distribution of annihilations along the wall would vary near the aperture, because some antihydrogen that would otherwise annihilate at the wall would instead annihilate on the aperture. That is, a shadow region forms behind the aperture, and the distribution of annihilations near the boundary of the shadow region is not azimuthally symmetric when the effect of gravity is significant. The Monte Carlo simulation is used together with analytical modeling to determine conditions under which the annihilation distribution would indicate the direction of the acceleration of antihydrogen due to gravity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atomic and Molecular Physics · Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Scientific Research and Discoveries

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of North Texas Department of Physics, , Denton, Texas 76203, USA

Funding

"U.S. Department of Energy"

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Reviews of Modern Physics · 1999 · 71 · 8710.1103/RevModPhys.71.87 ↗
2. Physics Letters A · 1988 · 129 · 3810.1016/0375-9601(88)90470-7 ↗
3. Physics of Plasmas · 2008 · 15 · 08350410.1063/1.2975362 ↗
4. Physics of Plasmas · 1997 · 4 · 231310.1063/1.872404 ↗
5. Physics of Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 328910.1063/1.1494822 ↗
6. Physics Review E · 1999 · 59 · 712110.1103/PhysRevE.59.7121 ↗
7. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 1996 · 24 · 137810.1109/27.553204 ↗
8. Nature (London) · 2002 · 419 · 45610.1038/nature01096 ↗
9. Physical Review Letters · 2002 · 89 · 21340110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.213401 ↗
10. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 24340110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.243401 ↗
11. Nature (London) · 2010 · 468 · 67310.1038/nature09610 ↗
12. Nature Physics · 2011 · 7 · 55810.1038/nphys2025 ↗
13. Physical Review Letters · 2004 · 93 · 26340110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.263401 ↗
14. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics · 2008 · 41 · 19200110.1088/0953-4075/41/19/192001 ↗
15. Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics · 2005 · 50 · 15510.1016/S1049-250X(05)80009-6 ↗
16. Nuclear Physics A · 2010 · 834 · 751c10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.01.136 ↗
17. Physics Reports · 1994 · 241 · 6510.1016/0370-1573(94)90081-7 ↗
18. Physics Reports · 2004 · 402 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.002 ↗
19. Physics of Plasmas · 2004 · 11 · 233310.1063/1.1651487 ↗
20. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A · 2010 · 368 · 367110.1098/rsta.2010.0026 ↗
21. Physical Review E · 2007 · 76 · 01740210.1103/PhysRevE.76.017402 ↗
22. Physical Review Letters · 2011 · 106 · 07300210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.073002 ↗
23. Physical Review Letters · 2011 · 106 · 02500210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.025002 ↗
24. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 21300210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.213002 ↗
25. Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 105 · 01300310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.013003 ↗