journal article·2018-09-01Open access

Theoretical and experimental research on a high efficiency X-band klystron-like RBWO

Dewen Yang, Yanchao Shi, Renzhen Xiao, Yan Teng, Jun Sun, Changhua Chen

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 9

Abstract

In this paper, we study an X-band klystron-like relativistic backward wave oscillator (RBWO) with a pre-modulation cavity, modulation ridge, drift tube in the slow wave structure (SWS) and extraction cavity in both theoretical and experiment. PIC simulations show that the conversion efficiency can be up to 62% with output power of 3.0 GW. In experiment, when the diode voltage is 660 kV, and the diode current is 6.4 kA, the output power is 1.9 GW, and the conversion efficiency is 45%(±5%). And we find that the conversion efficiency mainly suffers from the breakdown in the extraction cavity and the plasma from the cylindrical collector. To suppress the breakdown and plasma effect, the breakdown electric field threshold in RF structures(especially in the extraction cavity) had better be larger than 700 kV/cm. Moreover, the distance between the position where the electrons are collected and the end of extraction cavity should be larger than 20 mm in case of the cylindrical collector.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research · Pulsed Power Technology Applications · Microwave Engineering and Waveguides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Science and Technology on High Power Microwave Laboratory, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology , Xi’an 710024, China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys Fluids · 1985 · 28 · 288210.1063/1.865209 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2002 · 30 · 110810.1109/tps.2002.801656 ↗
3. Matter and Radiation at Extremes · 2016 · 1 · 16310.1016/j.mre.2016.04.001 ↗
4. Tech. Phys Lett. · 2008 · 34 · 23510.1134/s1063785008030176 ↗
5. Tech Phys Lett. · 2002 · 28 · 80610.1134/1.1519013 ↗
6. Tech Phys Lett · 2008 · 34 · 82210.1134/s1063785008100039 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1970 · 17 · 49110.1063/1.1653281 ↗
8. JETP Lett. · 1973 · 18 · 138
9. Phys Rev. Lett. · 1974 · 33 · 127810.1103/physrevlett.33.1278 ↗
10. Russian Physics Journal · 1996 · 39 · 120610.1007/bf02436163 ↗
11. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics · 1999 · 42 · 104710.1007/bf02677128 ↗
12. Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. · 1980 · 6 · 191
13. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 11311310.1063/1.4835335 ↗
14. Sov. Tech. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 18 · 265
15. Tech. Phys. Let. · 2005 · 31 · 41110.1134/1.1931784 ↗
16. Tech. Physics · 2008 · 53 · 147110.1134/s1063784208110121 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 05330610.1063/1.3086635 ↗
18. Laser Part. Beams · 2010 · 28 · 50510.1017/s0263034610000509 ↗
19. Tech. Physics · 2017 · 62 · 96110.1134/s1063784217060251 ↗
20. Phys. Plasmas · 2009 · 16 · 03310810.1063/1.3091931 ↗
21. Phys Plasmas · 2015 · 22 · 07210710.1063/1.4926526 ↗
22. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics · 2003 · 46 · 79710.1023/b:raqe.0000026873.02808.9d ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2018 · 46 · 3310.1109/tps.2017.2773661 ↗