journal article·2025-11-01Open access

Flow-dynamics informed Kolmogorov–Arnold networks for simulating subsonic compressible flow around airfoils

Jianren Sun, Zhongyang Fei, Pan Qin

AIP Advances· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

Deep learning has been probed for surrogate modeling of flow around airfoils. While physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) built on sparse data possess some physical interpretability, the prediction of flow fields may deviate from the true distribution. Moreover, the complex interactions among numerous parameters and layer nodes in traditional multi-layer perceptrons further limit interpretability. To ensure the credibility of predictions, this paper proposes flow-dynamics informed Kolmogorov–Arnold networks (FDIKANs) to simulate subsonic compressible unsteady flow fields around airfoils developed by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. The proposed framework embeds flow dynamics implied by the Euler equations into small datasets and shows potential in interpretable symbolic regression through learnable nonlinear activation functions. The scalability of Kolmogorov–Arnold networks (KANs) enables using different variants, for which we specify FDIKANs with Skip connections and Radial Basis Functions (SRBFs). Compared to vanilla KANs, FDIKANs with SRBFs reduce model parameters by 70% and save training time by 90% (refer to Table I in Sec. IV B 1). Our method involves adaptive weight balancing and parameter-efficient structure search algorithms to improve training performance and determine the network structure. Experiments show that under different flow conditions, FDIKANs significantly outperform PINNs, reducing the prediction error of the density field representing compression effects by 30%. In addition, numerical simulation data validate the generalization capability of FDIKANs to unseen spatial domains and airfoils, indicating their potential as a promising tool for rapid and accurate prediction of detailed compressible unsteady flow fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Intelligent Control and Optimization for Industrial Equipment of Ministry of Education, School of Control Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian 116024,

Funding

Aero Engine Corporation of China

References (83)

Show source-provided references
1. A perspective on the state of aerospace computational fluid dynamics technology10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-124800 ↗
2. Flow characteristics around airfoils near transonic buffet onset conditions10.1016/j.cja.2019.12.022 ↗
3. Finite element methodology for modeling aircraft aerodynamics: Development, simulation, and validation10.1007/s00466-022-02178-7 ↗
4. A boundary surrogate model for micro/nano grooved surface structure applied in turbulence flow control over airfoil10.1016/j.cja.2021.04.026 ↗
5. 2007
6. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
7. Recent progress of machine learning in flow modeling and active flow control10.1016/j.cja.2021.07.027 ↗
8. Towards a new paradigm in intelligence-driven computational fluid dynamics simulations10.1080/19942060.2024.2407005 ↗
9. Fast predictions of aircraft aerodynamics using deep-learning techniques10.2514/1.J061234 ↗
10. Parametric non-intrusive model order reduction for flow-fields using unsupervised machine learning10.1016/j.cma.2021.113999 ↗
11. Non-intrusive reduced-order model for predicting transonic flow with varying geometries10.1016/j.cja.2019.12.014 ↗
12. Steady-state transonic flowfield prediction via deep-learning framework10.2514/1.j063545 ↗
13. Neural fields for rapid aircraft aerodynamics simulations10.1038/s41598-024-76983-w ↗
14. Aerodynamic coefficient prediction of airfoils using neural networks
15. Fast pressure distribution prediction of airfoils using deep learning10.1016/j.ast.2020.105949 ↗
16. Data-driven prediction of unsteady pressure distributions based on deep learning10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2021.103316 ↗
17. Deep learning velocity signals allow quantifying turbulence intensity10.1126/sciadv.aba7281 ↗
18. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics10.1073/pnas.2101784118 ↗
19. Turbulence closure for high Reynolds number airfoil flows by deep neural networks10.1016/j.ast.2020.106452 ↗
20. Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks10.1007/s00466-019-01740-0 ↗
21. Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach10.1063/1.5094943 ↗
22. Flow field modeling of airfoil based on convolutional neural networks from transform domain perspective10.1016/j.ast.2023.108198 ↗
23. Learning aerodynamics with neural network10.1038/s41598-022-10737-4 ↗
24. A deep learning approach for the transonic flow field predictions around airfoils10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105312 ↗
25. Time-variant prediction of flow over an airfoil using deep neural network10.1063/5.0022222 ↗
26. Multi-level convolutional autoencoder networks for parametric prediction of spatio-temporal dynamics10.1016/j.cma.2020.113379 ↗
27. An application of space-filling curves to improve results of turbulent aerodynamics modeling with convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.cja.2023.09.003 ↗
28. Deep learning-based predictive modeling of transonic flow over an airfoil10.1063/5.0238413 ↗
29. Towards high-accuracy deep learning inference of compressible flows over aerofoils10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105707 ↗
30. Intelligent aerodynamic modelling method for steady/unsteady flow fields of airfoils driven by flow field images based on modified u-net neural network10.1080/19942060.2024.2440075 ↗
31. Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of airfoil flows10.2514/1.J058291 ↗
32. Fast simulation of airfoil flow field via deep neural network10.1016/j.ast.2024.109207 ↗
33. Transfer learning from two-dimensional supercritical airfoils to three-dimensional transonic swept wings10.1016/j.cja.2023.04.008 ↗
34. General framework for unsteady aerodynamic prediction of airfoils based on deep transfer learning10.1016/j.ast.2024.109606 ↗
35. Towards sparse sensor annotations: Uncertainty-based active transfer learning for airfoil flow field prediction10.1016/j.cja.2024.08.039 ↗
36. An intelligent method for predicting the pressure coefficient curve of airfoil-based conditional generative adversarial networks10.1109/tnnls.2021.3111911 ↗
37. A deep learning approach for efficiently and accurately evaluating the flow field of supercritical airfoils10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104393 ↗
38. A generative deep learning framework for airfoil flow field prediction with sparse data10.1016/j.cja.2021.02.012 ↗
39. PointNet: Deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation
40. A point cloud deep neural network metamodel method for aerodynamic prediction10.1016/j.cja.2022.11.025 ↗
41. Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils10.1063/1.5061693 ↗
42. Flow field prediction of supercritical airfoils via variational autoencoder based deep learning framework10.1063/5.0053979 ↗
43. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
44. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
45. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
46. Scientific machine learning for modeling and simulating complex fluids10.1073/pnas.2304669120 ↗
47. Turbulence modeling in the age of data10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547 ↗
48. Physics-informed machine learning using low-fidelity flowfields for inverse airfoil shape design10.2514/1.j063570 ↗
49. Physics-informed deep learning for simultaneous surrogate modeling and PDE-constrained optimization of an airfoil geometry10.1016/j.cma.2023.116042 ↗
50. Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations10.1063/5.0095270 ↗
51. Physics-informed neural networks for inviscid transonic flows around an airfoil10.1063/5.0276518 ↗
52. Flight dynamic uncertainty quantification modeling using physics-informed neural networks
53. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
54. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
55. Lie point symmetry and physics informed networks
56. PINNACLE: PINN adaptive collocation and experimental points selection
57. RoPINN: Region optimized physics-informed neural networks
58. Advances in physics-informed neural networks for solving complex partial differential equations and their engineering applications: A systematic review10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112044 ↗
59. A comprehensive review of advances in physics-informed neural networks and their applications in complex fluid dynamics10.1063/5.0226562 ↗
60. Respecting causality for training physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.cma.2024.116813 ↗
61. A solver for subsonic flow around airfoils based on physics-informed neural networks and mesh transformation10.1063/5.0188665 ↗
62. S. Ghosh , J.Busch, G. O.Brikis, and B.Dey, “Geometry-aware PINNs for turbulent flow prediction,” arXiv:2412.01954 (2024).
63. Enhancing the accuracy of physics-informed neural networks for indoor airflow simulation with experimental data and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes turbulence model10.1063/5.0216394 ↗
64. Review of challenges and opportunities in turbulence modeling: A comparative analysis of data-driven machine learning approaches10.3390/jmse11071440 ↗
65. On the representations of continuous functions of many variables by superposition of continuous functions of one variable and addition
66. The Kolmogorov–Arnold representation theorem revisited10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.020 ↗
67. Z. Liu , P.Ma, Y.Wang, W.Matusik, and M.Tegmark, “KAN 2.0: Kolmogorov–Arnold networks meet science,” arXiv:2408.10205 (2024).
68. KAN: Kolmogorov–Arnold networks
69. S. S. Sidharth , A. R.Keerthana, R.Gokul, and K. P.Anas, “Chebyshev polynomial-based Kolmogorov–Arnold networks: An efficient architecture for nonlinear function approximation,” arXiv:2405.07200 (2024).
70. H.-T. Ta , “BSRBF-KAN: A combination of B-splines and radial basis functions in Kolmogorov–Arnold networks,” arXiv:2406.11173 (2024).
71. T. Ji , Y.Hou, and D.Zhang, “A comprehensive survey on Kolmogorov Arnold networks (KAN),” arXiv:2407.11075 (2024).
72. A survey on Kolmogorov–Arnold network10.1145/3743128 ↗
73. Kolmogorov–Arnold networks for data-driven turbulence modeling
74. Kolmogorov–Arnold PointNet: Deep learning for prediction of fluid fields on irregular geometries10.1016/j.cma.2025.117888 ↗
75. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
76. Automatic differentiation in PyTorch
77. PINNs-torch: Enhancing speed and usability of physics-informed neural networks with PyTorch
78. D. Hendrycks and K.Gimpel, “Gaussian error linear units (GELUs),” arXiv:1606.08415 (2023).
79. 2002
80. 2009
81. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x ↗
82. Crested porcupine optimizer: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111257 ↗
83. 2023