journal article·2026-01-01Open access

Effect of cross-sectional anisotropy on shock train dynamics in supersonic internal flows

J. Singh, V. Raman

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 1

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of duct aspect ratio (AR), defined as the ratio of major to minor axis in an elliptical duct, on shock train dynamics for a freestream Mach number of 2.1. The AR is varied from 1.0 to 3.0 while maintaining a constant cross-sectional area and identical upstream conditions, thereby ensuring the same inlet mass flow and nearly constant boundary-layer-induced blockage across all ARs. This isolates shape-induced confinement effects. Simulations are performed using an embedded-boundary method with adaptive mesh refinement, which enabled the finest resolution of 48 μm, resolving the shocks in the shock train. The results show that the duct aspect ratio, AR, significantly modifies the shock train morphology. With increasing AR, the number of discrete shock cells decreases, and the leading shock front elongates along the major axis while contracting along the minor axis. The normal shock stem prominent in the circular duct (AR = 1.0) nearly disappears at AR = 3.0. Despite these morphological changes, the wall-pressure trace and stagnation-pressure loss remain largely insensitive to the AR. These results indicate that while the duct cross section governs the detailed shock train structure, the overall efficiency of flow deceleration and pressure recovery is dictated primarily by the effective blockage imposed by the turbulent boundary layer rather than the aspect ratio itself for a given mass flow rate and pressure ratio across the pseudo-shock.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Combustion and flame dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109,

Funding

Office of Naval Research · Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows10.1016/s0376-0421(98)00011-6 ↗
2. The mechanism of pseudo-shock waves10.1299/jsme1958.17.731 ↗
3. Characteristics of multiple shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions in rectangular ducts10.2514/3.23243 ↗
4. Shock train unsteadiness characteristics, oblique-to-normal transition, and three-dimensional leading shock structure10.2514/1.j056344 ↗
5. 0113
6. 2001 · 519
7. Numerical investigation of shock-train response to inflow boundary-layer variations10.2514/1.j055333 ↗
8. Structure of shock waves in cylindrical ducts10.2514/3.50600 ↗
9. Numerical study of the effect of sidewalls on shock train behaviour10.1017/flo.2023.6 ↗
10. 2013 · 3204
11. Large-eddy simulations of a normal shock train in a constant-area isolator10.2514/1.j052348 ↗
12. Assessment of pseudoshock models against experiment in a low-aspect-ratio isolator10.2514/1.b38913 ↗
13. Shock train/boundary-layer interaction in rectangular isolators10.2514/1.j054917 ↗
14. Investigation of shock dynamics in an axisymmetric inlet/isolator with attached boundary layers10.1017/jfm.2020.899 ↗
15. On the origin and propagation of perturbations that cause shock train inherent unsteadiness10.1017/jfm.2018.927 ↗
16. S. Sharma , R.Bielawski, O.Gibson, S.Zhang, V.Sharma, A. H.Rauch, J.Singh, S.Abisleiman, M.Ullman, S.Barwey, “An AMReX-based compressible reacting flow solver for high-speed reacting flows relevant to hypersonic propulsion,” arXiv:2412.00900 (2024).
17. AMReX: A framework for block-structured adaptive mesh refinement10.21105/joss.01370 ↗
18. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver10.1007/bf01414629 ↗
19. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes10.1090/s0025-5718-98-00913-2 ↗
20. A. Carreon , J.Singh, S.Sharma, S.Zhang, and V.Raman, “A GPU-based compressible combustion solver for applications exhibiting disparate space and time scales,” arXiv:2510.23993 (2025).
21. A Cartesian grid embedded boundary method for the heat equation and Poisson’s equation in three dimensions10.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.010 ↗
22. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic pipe flow at moderate Reynolds number10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.02.001 ↗
23. Compressible turbulent channel and pipe flow: Similarities and differences10.1017/s0022112009993004 ↗
24. Supersonic turbulent pipe flow at computationally moderate Reynolds numbers10.1063/5.0278762 ↗
25. Shock train response to high-frequency backpressure forcing10.2514/1.j060811 ↗
26. Coherent helical structures inherent to unsteady shock trains in circular duct10.2514/1.j065055 ↗