Predicting drag coefficients of vehicle geometries: A PointNet++ point cloud surrogate model approach
Source abstract
Abstract
In automotive aerodynamics, traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for predicting the drag coefficients (Cd) are computationally intensive and often require hours to days, thereby hindering rapid design iterations. In this study, we developed a deep-learning surrogate model using PointNet++ for fast and accurate Cd prediction from vehicle point-cloud geometries. The model features a hierarchical architecture with set abstraction layers using farthest point sampling, ball query grouping, and multilayer perceptrons with channel configurations [32, 32, 64], [64, 64, 128], and [128, 256, 512], followed by fully connected layers (256 × 128 × 64) with dropouts. Trained on the DrivAerNet++ dataset of 8000 designs with 2048-point clouds, it employs data augmentation via random scaling (0.9–1.1), Gaussian jitter (σ = 0.005), and 5% point dropout. The optimization used the mean squared error loss, an initial learning rate of 0.0001, and a cosine annealing scheduler over 200 epochs with a batch size of 64. The model achieves a mean squared error of 1.72 × 10−5 and an R2 of 0.7815 on the test set, with inference times of 10–15 ms on an NVIDIA RTX A4000 GPU, outperforming baseline PointNet (R2 = 0.643) and offering a ∼10.5-fold speedup over CFD. This mesh-free framework balances the accuracy and speed, with ablation studies confirming its robustness to geometric variations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, China
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Q. Chen , M.Elrefaie, A.Dai, and F.Ahmed, “TripNet: Learning large-scale high-fidelity 3D car aerodynamics with triplane networks,” arXiv:2503.17400 (2024).
2. Deep learning for real-time aerodynamic evaluations of arbitrary vehicle shapes10.4271/15-15-02-0006 ↗
3. 3D flow field estimation around a vehicle using convolutional neural networks
4. DrivAerNet++: A large-scale multimodal car dataset with computational fluid dynamics simulations and deep learning benchmarks
5. Generative AI driven aerodynamic shape optimization: A neural network-based framework for enhancing performance and efficiency10.55524/ijircst.2025.13.1.15 ↗
6. PointConvAttn: A deep learning approach for aerodynamic performance prediction of 3D aircraft based on point cloud data10.1093/jcde/qwaf051 ↗
7. Numerical simulation of external flow-field of a car body based on CFD10.1088/1742-6596/2441/1/012008 ↗
8. B. Alkin , M.Bleeker, R.Kurle, T.Kronlachner, R.Sonnleitner, M.Dorfer, and J.Brandstetter, “AB-UPT: Scaling neural CFD surrogates for high-fidelity automotive aerodynamics simulations via anchored-branched universal physics transformers,” arXiv:2502.09692 (2025).
9. V. Ananthan , N.Ashton, N.Chadwick, M.Lizarraga, D.Maddix, S.Maheswaran, P. H.Moreno, P.M Shabestari, S.Sovani, S.Subramanian, S.Tadepalli, and P.Yu, “Machine learning for road vehicle aerodynamics,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2024-01-2529, 2024.10.4271/2024-01-2529 ↗
10. N. Ashton , J. B.Angel, A. S.Ghate, G. K. W.Kenway, M. L.Wong, C.Kiris, A.Walle, D. C.Maddix, and G.Page, “WindsorML: High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics dataset for automotive aerodynamics,” arXiv:2407.19320 (2024).
11. Benchmarking convolutional neural network and graph neural network based surrogate models on a real-world car external aerodynamics dataset10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106760 ↗
12. Data-driven aerodynamic design and optimization of vehicles10.54097/eqydp759 ↗
13. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics10.1073/pnas.2101784118 ↗
14. 2025
15. Deep learning based fast prediction of aerodynamic parameters for ducted propellers
16. C. Duru , “A deep learning methodology for the flow field prediction around airfoils,” M.S. thesis, Middle East Technical University, 2021.10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105312 ↗
17. Perspectives on predicting and controlling turbulent flows through deep learning10.1063/5.0190452 ↗
18. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations
19. Data-driven modeling of unsteady flow based on deep operator network10.1063/5.0213233 ↗
20. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks
21. Point transformer
22. Fourier neural operator with boundary conditions for efficient prediction of steady airfoil flows10.1007/s10483-023-3050-9 ↗
23. Deep neural operators as accurate surrogates for shape optimization10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107615 ↗
24. M. Cranmer , A.Sanchez-Gonzalez, P.Battaglia, R.Xu, K.Nider, and T.Pfaff, “X-MeshGraphNet: Scalable multi-scale graph neural networks for physics simulation,” arXiv:2411.17164 (2024).
25. Point2FFD: A point cloud framework for reduced-order modeling of 3D geometries