Theoretical study of Sn and Te adsorption over graphene from ab initio calculations
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we report on theoretical calculations for the adsorption of both Sn and Te atoms over a graphene monolayer. Our obtained results show that Sn is chemisorbed over a graphene C–C bond, once the presence of Sn over the substrate changes some of graphene’s C–C sp2-like bond character to a more covalently reactive sp3-like one. On the other hand, Te is physisorbed over a C atom of the graphene sheet, since it is weakly connected to the surface atoms by van der Waals’ forces. However, both Sn and Te are extremely mobile over the graphene monolayer because the energy barriers between the adsorption sites are very small. Considering that SiC surfaces passivated with graphene enhance the strength of the C–Sn bonds in the MBE growth procedure, our results, theoretically, confirm the growth of a SnTe layer on graphene.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Ciências Naturais, Universidade Federal de São João del Rei C. P. 110 1 , 36.300-000, São João del Rei, MG, Brazil
Department of Physics, Texas State University 2 , San Marcos, Texas 78666, USA
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/revmodphys.81.109 ↗
3. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2018 · 69 · 29910.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-021353 ↗
4. Science · 2016 · 353 · 27410.1126/science.aad8609 ↗
5. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 04110210.1063/1.5091546 ↗
6. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1987 · 20 · 164110.1088/0022-3719/20/11/008 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 23543010.1103/physrevb.77.235430 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 11431110.1063/1.3437640 ↗
9. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 307 · 15810.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.005 ↗
10. RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 72910.1039/c6ra25118h ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 14160110.1063/1.5098037 ↗
12. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 1570010.1038/s41598-017-15610-3 ↗
13. 2011 · 3
14. 2014 · 434
15. Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · 86410.1103/physrev.136.b864 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. · 1965 · 140 · 113310.1103/physrev.140.a1133 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
18. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 258210.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.007 ↗
19. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2016 · 205 · 10610.1016/j.cpc.2016.04.003 ↗
20. J. Comput. Chem. · 2011 · 32 · 145610.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 08511710.1103/physrevb.88.085117 ↗
22. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2018 · 226 · 3910.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/physrevb.13.5188 ↗
24. Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 52010.1038/srep00520 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 117 · 16680110.1103/physrevlett.117.166801 ↗
26. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 85810.1039/c7cp07542a ↗
27. J. Cryst. Growth · 2008 · 310 · 397310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.06.039 ↗