journal article·2024-08-01Open access

Dynamic reflectivity of an opto-acoustic three-layer transducer for picosecond ultrasonic measurements

Louise Le Ridant, Marie-Fraise Ponge, Bertrand Audoin

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

We present an analysis of a three-layered structure used for both launching and detecting picosecond acoustic waves. To enhance the optical sensitivity to the acoustic disturbances, a cavity is designed, which acts as a Fabry–Perot interferometer. We use analytic modeling based on dual optical and acoustic transfer matrix formalism to analyze the coupled optical and acoustic wave propagation. Assuming a three-layer transducer made of an optical cavity sandwiched between two thin metallic layers, the model allows for mastering of the coupled optical and acoustic responses, which leads to an optimum design of the structure, and it highlights the various acoustic contributions to the reflectivity changes. The sensitivity of this three-layered structure to acoustic disturbances is compared to the numerical predictions we performed for the standard opto-acoustic transducer made of a single metallic layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Physical Acoustics, University of Bordeaux 1 , CNRS UMR 5295, I2M, Talence, France

Physical Acoustics, University of Bordeaux 2 , CNRS UMR 5295, Bordeaux-INP, I2M, Talence, France

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 412910.1103/physrevb.34.4129 ↗
2. Ultrasonics · 2015 · 56 · 310.1016/j.ultras.2014.06.005 ↗
3. Photoacoustics · 2023 · 31 · 10049610.1016/j.pacs.2023.100496 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 07190910.1063/1.2975171 ↗
5. Minerals · 2020 · 10 · 21410.3390/min10030214 ↗
6. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2005 · 242 · 137910.1002/pssb.200440030 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 20310.1103/physrevb.54.203 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 21190310.1063/1.1929869 ↗
9. Physica B · 1999 · 263–264 · 57110.1016/s0921-4526(98)01479-3 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1504610.1103/physrevb.49.15046 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 69 · 166810.1103/physrevlett.69.1668 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 415710.1063/1.1687049 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 485210.1063/1.1406543 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 169210.1063/1.117030 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 12390110.1063/1.2988470 ↗
16. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 865010.1038/srep08650 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 21370110.1063/1.5129783 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 16090210.1063/5.0023744 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 16370110.1063/1.4918275 ↗
20. Photoacoustics · 2023 · 29 · 10044710.1016/j.pacs.2022.100447 ↗
21. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 89 · 01490110.1063/1.5019807 ↗
22. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control · 1999 · 46 · 157510.1109/58.808883 ↗
23. Ultrasound Med. Biol. · 1998 · 24 · 14310.1016/s0301-5629(97)00236-6 ↗
24. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing · 100641Y
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 08351610.1063/1.3095470 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 10353710.1063/1.3388283 ↗
27. Appl. Opt. · 2015 · 54 · 838810.1364/ao.54.008388 ↗
28. Appl. Opt. · 2002 · 41 · 397810.1364/ao.41.003978 ↗
29. Opt. Express · 2010 · 18 · 2471510.1364/oe.18.024715 ↗
30. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2002 · 19 · 302810.1364/JOSAB.19.003028 ↗
31. Ultrasonics · 1994 · 32 · 26510.1016/0041-624x(94)90005-1 ↗
32. J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 69 · 381610.1063/1.348958 ↗
33. J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 71 · 161710.1063/1.351218 ↗
34. Prog. Nat. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 444
35. Opt. Commun. · 1986 · 60 · 5510.1016/0030-4018(86)90116-1 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 06411410.1103/physrevb.74.064114 ↗
37. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2011 · 82 · 11490510.1063/1.3660193 ↗