journal article·2025-01-01Open access

Influence of the Zn2+ concentration on the defect structure and optical properties in Zn:Fe:Cu:LiNbO3 crystals

Zhehua Yan, Li Dai, Shunxiang Yang, Zesheng Ji

AIP Advances· Volume 15· Issue 1

Abstract

Special attention has been paid to holographic storage and 3D display in recent years. LiNbO3 crystal is a distinguished multifunctional material where the field of holographic storage is of paramount importance. In this work, the Czochralski method was employed to grow a series of Zn:Fe:Cu:LiNbO3 crystals with different doping concentrations of Zn2+ ions (1, 3, 5, and 7 mol. %). The effects of doped ions of Zn2+, Fe3+, and Cu2+ on crystal lattice parameters and defect structure were characterized by XRD and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES), and the optical homogeneity was characterized by the birefringence gradient method. The x-ray powder diffraction experiments reveal that the crystal lattice structure remains unaffected by doping. The ICP-AES analysis revealed that as the concentration of Zn2+ ions increased, there was an observed enhancement in the effective segregation coefficient of Fe3+ and Cu2+ ions, while a decrease was noted in that of Zn2+ ions. The birefringent gradient method demonstrates that the optical homogeneity improves with an increasing concentration of Zn2+ ion doping and reaches its maximum when the concentration of Zn2+ ion reaches 7 mol %. For the first time, the optical uniformity of Fe:Cu:LiNbO3 crystals has been enhanced by heavy Zn2+ ion doping, making it possible to apply it in the field of holographic storage.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics · Solid State Laser Technologies · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32 · 180645210.1002/adma.201806452 ↗
2. Inorg. Mater. · 2022 · 58 · 94810.1134/s0020168522090023 ↗
3. Nature · 1998 · 393 · 66510.1038/31429 ↗
4. Appl. Opt. · 1972 · 11 · 39010.1364/ao.11.000390 ↗
5. Opt. Lett. · 1993 · 18 · 91510.1364/ol.18.000915 ↗
6. Inorg. Mater. · 2019 · 55 · 36910.1134/s0020168519040125 ↗
7. ACS Photonics · 2024 · 11 · 262410.1021/acsphotonics.4c00336 ↗
8. J. Alloy Compd. · 2018 · 753 · 40710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.201 ↗
9. Opt. Express · 2004 · 12 · 404710.1364/opex.12.004047 ↗
10. Chin. Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 10 · 5610.3788/COL201210.122101 ↗
11. J. Cryst. Growth · 2005 · 280 · 22710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2005.03.058 ↗
12. Opt. Lasers Eng. · 2014 · 54 · 7310.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.09.008 ↗
13. J. Mol. Struct. · 2013 · 1053 · 110.1016/j.molstruc.2013.09.002 ↗
14. Eur. Phys. J. D · 2014 · 68 · 8210.1140/epjd/e2014-40356-8 ↗
15. Appl. Opt. · 2002 · 41 · 680910.1364/ao.41.006809 ↗
16. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 11541310.1088/0022-3727/42/11/115413 ↗
17. Mod. Phys. Lett. B · 2014 · 28 · 322810.1142/S0217984914500389 ↗
18. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 910.1063/1.5038171 ↗
19. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids · 2023 · 178 · 21910.1080/10420150.2022.2116709 ↗
20. Cryst. Res. Technol. · 2018 · 54 · 180019310.1002/crat.201800193 ↗
21. Opt. Commun. · 2003 · 227 · 25910.1016/j.optcom.2003.09.054 ↗
22. Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 84 · 710.1016/j.matchemphys.2003.09.053 ↗
23. Mater. Lett. · 2004 · 58 · 100010.1016/j.matlet.2003.08.005 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. B · 2003 · 76 · 65510.1007/s00340-003-1158-y ↗
25. Cryst. Res. Technol. · 2020 · 55 · 190017610.1002/crat.201900176 ↗
26. Opt. Lett. · 1993 · 18 · 91210.1364/ol.18.000912 ↗
27. Cryst. Res. Technol. · 2004 · 39 · 33710.1002/crat.200310192 ↗
28. Acta Physica Pol. A · 2015 · 127 · 8410.12693/aphyspola.127.84 ↗
29. Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2004 · 88 · 9710.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.06.026 ↗