Simulation of dynamic characteristics for ELM filaments on EAST tokamak using BOUT++
Source abstract
Abstract
To study the dynamic characteristics of filamentary structure during the edge-localized mode (ELM) burst on the experimental advanced superconducting tokamak, the BOUT++ six-field two-fluid model is used to simulate the temporal and spatial evolutions of the ELM filaments. In the peak gradient region at the outer mid-plane, the radial speed of filaments is changed frequently and varied from 0.11 km/s to 0.79 km/s, and the poloidal speed oscillates in the range of 0.61–0.85 km/s. The width of the ELM filaments is increased from 7.76 mm to 26.7 mm and grows rapidly to 41.99 mm from t = 0.2717 ms to 0.2831 ms after the start of the burst. After that, the width decreases gradually and stabilizes at 25–30 mm when it comes to the saturation phase. Further research indicates that the filament propagation speed is increased during their outward movement. The width gradually decreases when the filaments move outward, and it is proportional to electron temperature (Te) perturbation. All the results are consistent with the experimental data presented by Chen et al., IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 47, 799 (2019).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Superconducting Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Science, Donghua University 1 , Shanghai 201620, China
School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Anqing Normal University 2 , Anqing 246133, China
Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 3 , Hefei 230031, China
Funding
National Key R&D Program of China · K. C. Wong Education Foundation · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences · Anhui Department of Education · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Plasmas · 1998 · 5 · 268710.1063/1.872956 ↗
2. Phys. Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 203710.1063/1.1449463 ↗
3. Nucl. Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 10304010.1088/0029-5515/51/10/103040 ↗
4. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 1996 · 38 · 121310.1088/0741-3335/38/8/012 ↗
5. Progress and issues in understanding the physics of ELM dynamics, ELM mitigation, and ELM control10.1088/1742-6596/123/1/012002 ↗
6. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2005 · 47 · 99510.1088/0741-3335/47/7/003 ↗
7. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2008 · 50 · 04500710.1088/0741-3335/50/4/045007 ↗
8. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 17 · 99110.1088/1009-0630/17/12/02 ↗
9. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 18 · 88410.1088/1009-0630/18/9/02 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2019 · 47 · 79910.1109/tps.2018.2872328 ↗
11. Commun. Comput. Phys. · 2009 · 180 · 146710.1016/j.cpc.2009.03.008 ↗
12. Nucl. Fusion · 2017 · 57 · 11601610.1088/1741-4326/aa7bba ↗
13. Nucl. Fusion · 2019 · 59 · 07604310.1088/1741-4326/ab1f15 ↗
14. Chin. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 36 · 04520110.1088/0256-307x/36/4/045201 ↗
15. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2018 · 60 · 05500710.1088/1361-6587/aab52c ↗
16. Nucl. Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 07300910.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073009 ↗
17. Nucl. Fusion · 2015 · 55 · 11303010.1088/0029-5515/55/11/113030 ↗
18. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 48 · 96810.13182/fst48-968 ↗