journal article·2024-01-01Open access

Optimizing a deep learning model for the prediction of electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation for mild to moderate traumatic brain injury patients

Yash R. Saxena, Connor J. Lewis, Joseph V. Lee, Laura M. Franke, Muhammad Sabbir Alam, Mohannad Tashli, Jayasimha Atulasimha, Ravi L. Hadimani

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 1

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method for treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. It is being tested as an experimental treatment for patients with mild to moderate traumatic brain injuries (mTBI). Due to the complex, heterogeneous composition of the brain, it is difficult to determine if targeted brain regions receive the correct amount of electric field (E-field) induced by the TMS coil. E-field distributions can be calculated by running time-consuming finite element analysis (FEA) simulations of TMS on patient head models. Using machine learning, the E-field can be predicted in real-time. Our prior work used a Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) to predict the E-field in healthy patients. This study applies the same DCNN to mTBI patients and investigates how model depth and color space of E-field images affect model performance. Nine DCNNs were created using combinations of 3, 4, or 5 encoder and decoder blocks with the color spaces RGB, LAB, and YCbCr. As depth increased, training and testing peak signal-to-noise ratios (PSNR) increased and mean squared errors (MSE) decreased. The depth 5 YCbCr model had the highest training and testing PSNRs of 34.77 and 29.08 dB and lowest training and testing MSEs of 3.335∗10−4 and 1.237∗10−3 respectively. Compared to the model in our prior work, models of depth 5 have higher testing PSNRs and lower MSEs and, except for RGB. Thus, DCNNs with depth 5 and alternative color spaces, despite losing information through color space conversions, resulted in higher PSNRs and lower MSEs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Functional Brain Connectivity Studies · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University 1 , Richmond, 23284 Virginia, USA

Maggie L. Walker Governor’s School 2 , Richmond, 23220 Virginia, USA

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University 3 , Richmond, 23284 Virginia, USA

Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center 4 , Richmond, 23249 Virginia, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University 5 , Richmond, 23284 Virginia, USA

Martino’s Center for Biomedical Engineering, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University 6 , Boston, 02115 Massachusetts, USA

Funding

Commonwealth Cyber Initiative · Long-Term Impact of Military-Relevant Brain Injury Consortium · Commonwealth Neurotrauma Initiative Trust Fund · VCU Breakthrough Grant

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. A Visual and narrative Timeline of US FDA milestones for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) devices, brain stimulation: Basic, translational10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.010 ↗
2. Daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for major depressive disorder: A Sham-controlled randomized trial10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46 ↗
3. O. of The Commissioner, “FDA permits marketing of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder,” https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-obsessive-compulsive-disorder
4. Smoking cessation induced by deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the prefrontal and insular cortices: A prospective, randomized controlled trial10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.020 ↗
5. Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: Setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.002 ↗
6. Krames · 2018 · 1619
7. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices10.1016/j.brs.2011.10.001 ↗
8. Effect of anatomical brain development on induced electric fields during transcranial magnetic stimulation10.1109/tmag.2014.2326819 ↗
9. The effect of coil to cortex distance and induced electric field strength on resting motor thresholds in schizophrenia patients10.1109/TMAG.2023.3282784 ↗
10. Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability10.1007/s002210000432 ↗
11. Magnetic stimulation: Motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology
12. Active and resting motor threshold are efficiently obtained with adaptive threshold hunting10.1371/journal.pone.0186007 ↗
13. Resting and active motor thresholds versus stimulus–response curves to determine transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity in quadriceps femoris10.1186/1743-0003-11-40 ↗
14. Investigational effect of brain-scalp distance on the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression10.1109/tmag.2015.2514158 ↗
15. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of mouse brain using high-resolution anatomical models10.1063/1.4862217 ↗
16. Effect of anatomical variability in brain on transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment10.1063/1.4974981 ↗
17. Computational analysis of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the presence of deep brain stimulation probes10.1063/1.4974062 ↗
18. An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 ↗
19. Deep learning as a tool for neural data analysis: Speech classification and cross-frequency coupling in human sensorimotor cortex10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007091 ↗
20. Real-time estimation of electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep neural networks10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.015 ↗
21. Neural network model for estimation of the induced electric field during transcranial magnetic stimulation10.1109/tmag.2021.3086761 ↗
22. Rapid whole-brain electric field mapping in transcranial magnetic stimulation using deep learning10.1371/journal.pone.0254588 ↗
23. Computation of transcranial magnetic stimulation electric fields using self-supervised deep learning10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119705 ↗
24. Prediction of electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the brain using a deep encoder-decoder convolutional neural network
25. Randomized trial of RTMS in traumatic brain injury: Improved subjective neurobehavioral symptoms and increases in EEG delta activity10.1080/02699052.2022.2033845 ↗
26. The relationship of neuroanatomy on resting motor threshold and induced electric field strength on treatment outcomes in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury patients during transcranial magnetic stimulation10.1063/9.0000567 ↗
27. Effect of fiber tracts and depolarized brain volume on resting motor thresholds during transcranial magnetic stimulation10.1109/tmag.2022.3148214 ↗
28. Brain · 1997 · 120 · 14110.1093/brain/120.1.141 ↗
29. The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on anxiety in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial10.3389/fneur.2020.564940 ↗
30. Quadruple butterfly coil with passive magnetic shielding for focused transcranial magnetic stimulation10.1109/tmag.2017.2711962 ↗
31. Deep brain transcranial magnetic stimulation using variable “Halo coil” system10.1063/1.4913937 ↗
32. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Development of a novel deep-brain triple-halo coil10.1109/lmag.2019.2903993 ↗