Equation of state remeasurements for aluminum and copper under low-impact loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the Hugoniot equation of state for aluminum and copper under low-impact loading was measured by using the plane impact technique and laser Doppler velocimetry. The linear relationship between shock wave velocity and particle velocity was fitted by a least squares method, with D=5.28114+1.306(17)us for an Al pressure range from 2.5 to 13.9 GPa and D=3.9386+1.484(14)us for Cu at 5.7–47.5 GPa. The linear fitting correlation coefficient was greater than 0.99, which was better than the previous experimental data. The results demonstrate that the Doppler pin system has great advantages for measuring the Hugoniot EoS at low shock pressure compared with the electric pin technique The experimental data obtained in this work extend to a lower pressure range. This can provide more accurate Mie–Grüneisen EoS of Al and Cu under low shock pressure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-pressure geophysics and materials · Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology 1 , Wuhan 430070, China
National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics 2 , Mianyang, China
State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting, Jianghan University 3 , Wuhan 430056, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 1996 · 18 · 14110.1016/0734-743x(95)00023-4 ↗
2. Int. J. Impact Eng. · 2006 · 32 · 74110.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.03.008 ↗
3. Composites, Part B · 2013 · 46 · 3910.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.044 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 07352610.1063/1.2071449 ↗
5. Physica B · 2012 · 407 · 253310.1016/j.physb.2012.03.062 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 336310.1063/1.329160 ↗
7. 1980
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 30410.1063/1.1529071 ↗
9. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. · 1995 · 81 · 464
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 549610.1063/1.1319320 ↗
11. 1970 · 294
12. 1977
13. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth · 2019 · 124 · 830010.1029/2019jb017983 ↗
14. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. · 2020 · 306 · 10650610.1016/j.pepi.2020.106506 ↗
15. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2018 · 89 · 02310110.1063/1.4989767 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 01352310.1063/1.2407290 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 09351610.1063/1.4894854 ↗
18. Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2016 · 660 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2016.02.080 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 22910.1063/1.4890714 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 11110.1063/1.2335948 ↗
21. J. Chem. Educ. · 1985 · 62 · 16710.1021/ed062p167 ↗
22. Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 19 · 08400910.1088/0957-0233/19/8/084009 ↗
23. Mater. Today Commun. · 2020 · 26 · 10199010.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101990 ↗
24. J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 808 · 15170210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151702 ↗
25. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 10521210.1063/1.5050426 ↗
26. J. Dyn. Behav. Mater. · 2023 · 9 · 2410.1007/s40870-022-00356-5 ↗