Building machine learning assisted phase diagrams: Three chemically relevant examples
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, we present a systematic procedure to build phase diagrams for chemically relevant properties by the use of a semi-supervised machine learning technique called uncertainty sampling. Concretely, we focus on ground state spin multiplicity and chemical bonding properties. As a first step, we have obtained single-eutectic-point-containing solid–liquid systems that have been suitable for contrasting the validity of this approach. Once this was settled, on the one hand, we built magnetic phase diagrams for several Hooke atoms containing a few electrons (4 and 6) trapped in spheroidal harmonic potentials. Changing the parameters of the confinement potential, such as curvature and anisotropy, and interelectronic interaction strength, we have been able to obtain and rationalize magnetic phase transitions flipping the ground state spin multiplicity from singlet (nonmagnetic) to triplet (magnetic) states. On the other hand, Bader’s analysis is performed upon helium dimers confined by spherical harmonic potentials. Covalency is studied using descriptors as the sign for Δρ(rC) and H(rC), and the dependency on the degrees of freedom of the system is studied, i.e., potential curvature ω2 and interatomic distance R. As a result, we have observed that there may exist a covalent bond between He atoms for short enough distances and strong enough confinement. This machine learning procedure could, in principle, be applied to the study of other chemically relevant properties involving phase diagrams, saving a lot of computational resources.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kimika Teorikoa, Polimero eta Material Aurreratuak: Fisika, Kimika eta Teknologia Saila, Kimika Fakultatea, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea UPV/EHU and Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC) , P.K. 1072, 20080 Donostia, Euskadi, Spain
Funding
Eusko Jaurlaritza
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Determining pressure-temperature phase diagrams of materials10.1103/physrevb.93.174108 ↗
2. Machine learning in chemoinformatics and drug discovery10.1016/j.drudis.2018.05.010 ↗
3. Enumeration of de novo inorganic complexes for chemical discovery and machine learning10.1039/c9me00069k ↗
4. Spectrum of deep learning algorithms in drug discovery10.1111/cbdd.13674 ↗
5. Accelerating chemical discovery with machine learning: Simulated evolution of spin crossover complexes with an artificial neural network10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170 ↗
6. Deep learning for deep chemistry: Optimizing the prediction of chemical patterns10.3389/fchem.2019.00809 ↗
7. O. T. Unke and M. Meuwly, “Machine learning potential energy surfaces,” arXiv:1909.08027 [physics.chem-ph] (2019).
8. Machine learning for potential energy surfaces: An extensive database and assessment of methods10.1063/1.5100141 ↗
9. Hierarchical machine learning of potential energy surfaces10.1063/5.0006498 ↗
10. Incorporating electronic information into machine learning potential energy surfaces via approaching the ground-state electronic energy as a function of atom-based electronic populations10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00217 ↗
11. High-dimensional potential energy surfaces for molecular simulations: From empiricism to machine learning10.1088/2632-2153/ab5922 ↗
12. Prediction of organic reaction outcomes using machine learning10.1021/acscentsci.7b00064 ↗
13. Using machine learning to predict suitable conditions for organic reactions10.1021/acscentsci.8b00357 ↗
14. T. D. Rhone, R. Hoyt, C. R. O’Connor, M. M. Montemore, C. S. S. R. Kumar, C. M. Friend, and E. Kaxiras, “Predicting outcomes of catalytic reactions using machine learning,” arXiv:1908.10953 [physics.chem-ph] (2019).
15. Efficient construction method for phase diagrams using uncertainty sampling10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.033802 ↗
16. Efficient phase diagram sampling by active learning10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b09202 ↗
17. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation
18. Influence of endohedral confinement on the electronic interaction between He atoms: A He2@C20H20 case study10.1002/chem.200801399 ↗
19. Formation of dimers of light noble atoms under encapsulation within fullerene’s voids10.1186/s11671-015-0871-x ↗
20. Confinement effects of a noble gas dimer inside a fullerene cage: Can it be used as an acceptor in a DSSC?10.3389/fchem.2020.00621 ↗
21. Is this a chemical bond? A theoretical study of Ng2@C60 (Ng=He, Ne, Ar, Kr, Xe)10.1002/chem.200700467 ↗
22. Noble gas dimers confined inside C7010.1039/c9cp03015h ↗
23. Noble gas endohedral fullerenes10.1039/d0sc02507k ↗
24. Confinement induced binding of noble gas atoms10.1063/1.4871800 ↗
25. Noble gas encapsulated B40 cage10.1039/c7cp07890k ↗
26. Confinement induced binding in noble gas atoms within a BN-doped carbon nanotube10.1016/j.cplett.2014.12.053 ↗
27. Thermodynamic calculation of n-component eutectic mixtures10.1142/S0129183104006121 ↗
28. Two electrons in an external oscillator potential: Particular analytic solutions of a Coulomb correlation problem10.1103/physreva.48.3561 ↗
29. Shannon entropy for the hydrogen atom confined by four different potentials10.3390/quantum1020018 ↗
30. Eigenstates and dynamics of Hooke’s atom: Exact results and path integral simulations10.1063/1.5028503 ↗
31. Hund’s rule in open-shell states of two-electron systems: From free through confined and screened atoms, to quantum dots10.17586/2220-8054-2019-10-1-31-41 ↗
32. Kinetic effects in 2D and 3D quantum dots: Comparison between high and low electron correlation regimes10.1016/j.comptc.2018.06.001 ↗
33. Universal scaling relations for the energies of many-electron Hooke atoms10.1103/physreva.95.042511 ↗
34. Two-electron atom with a screened interaction10.1103/physreva.95.022105 ↗
35. Evaluation of screened nuclear attraction and electron repulsion molecular integrals over Gaussian basis functions10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1997)62:3<273::aid-qua5>3.0.co;2-t ↗
36. Aufbau principle and singlet-triplet gap in spherical Hooke atoms
37. Stochastic variational approach to few-electron artificial atoms10.1103/physrevb.63.205308 ↗
38. The order of three lowest-energy states of the six-electron harmonium at small force constant10.1063/1.4953677 ↗
39. Benchmark calculations on the lowest-energy singlet, triplet, and quintet states of the four-electron harmonium atom10.1063/1.4891301 ↗
40. The change in the nature of bonding in the Li2 dimer under confinement10.1002/qua.26644 ↗
41. 2012
42. Active learning literature survey
43. A sequential algorithm for training text classifiers
44. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x ↗
45. A brief review on eutectic mixture and its role in pharmaceutical field10.26452/ijrps.v11i3.2398 ↗
46. Liquid pharmaceuticals formulation by eutectic formation10.1016/j.fluid.2017.05.009 ↗
47. Deep eutectic solvents as active pharmaceutical ingredient delivery systems in the treatment of metabolic related diseases10.3389/fphar.2021.794939 ↗
48. Revisiting greenness of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents10.1016/j.gce.2021.01.004 ↗
49. Eutectic mixtures based on polyalcohols as sustainable solvents: Screening and characterization10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05518 ↗