Predicting pressure coefficients of wing surface based on the transfer of spatial dependency
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-conditional holographic pressure coefficients over a wing are crucial for wing design, and a wind tunnel test is an indispensable means to obtain this profile. However, it is resource-consuming to obtain wind tunnel data under different conditions and only a limited number of sensors can be placed on the wing model during one test, which results in sparse pressure coefficient data with distribution inconsistency across cross sections and conditions. Thus, how to obtain pressure coefficients of more cross sections or even the whole wing surface with multiple conditions from the distribution-inconsistent sensor data becomes a challenging problem. Therefore, a deep learning framework based on transfer learning is proposed in this paper, in which the spatial dependency captured by a long short-term memory model between the obtained multi-conditional sensor data is transferred to other cross sections with few-condition data on the wing. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves high accuracy on the pressure coefficients prediction of distribution-inconsistent cross sections on wind tunnel test data, and thus improves data utilization and cuts costs by reducing wind tunnel tests under different design conditions. Our work proves the possibility of reconstructing the holographic flow field from sparse sensor data of wind tunnel tests and puts forward recommendations on the placement of sensors for achieving this goal.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach10.1063/1.5094943 ↗
2. T. P. Miyanawala and R. K. Jaiman, “An efficient deep learning technique for the Navier-Stokes equations: Application to unsteady wake flow dynamics,” arXiv:1710.09099 (2017).
3. Application of convolutional neural network to predict airfoil lift coefficient
4. Inverse design of airfoil using a deep convolutional neural network10.2514/1.j057894 ↗
5. Fast pressure distribution prediction of airfoils using deep learning10.1016/j.ast.2020.105949 ↗
6. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
7. FiniteNet: A fully convolutional LSTM network architecture for time-dependent partial differential equations
8. A novel long short-term memory neural-network-based self-excited force model of limit cycle oscillations of nonlinear flutter for various aerodynamic configurations10.1007/s11071-020-05631-5 ↗
9. Nonlinear unsteady bridge aerodynamics: Reduced-order modeling based on deep LSTM networks10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104116 ↗
10. A. T. Mohan and D. V. Gaitonde, “A deep learning based approach to reduced order modeling for turbulent flow control using LSTM neural networks,” arXiv:1804.09269 (2018).
11. Efficient prediction of transonic flutter boundaries for varying Mach number and angle of attack via LSTM network10.1016/j.ast.2020.106451 ↗
12. Time-resolved turbulent velocity field reconstruction using a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based artificial intelligence framework10.1063/1.5111558 ↗
13. R. Han, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, and G. Chen, “A new prediction method of unsteady wake flow by the hybrid deep neural network,” arXiv:1908.00294 (2019).10.1063/1.5127247 ↗
14. Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting
15. A deep learning approach for efficiently and accurately evaluating the flow field of supercritical airfoils10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104393 ↗
16. A generative deep learning framework for airfoil flow field prediction with sparse data10.1016/j.cja.2021.02.012 ↗
17. Enhanced data efficiency using deep neural networks and Gaussian processes for aerodynamic design optimization10.1016/j.ast.2021.106522 ↗
18. CNN-LSTM based reduced order modeling of two-dimensional unsteady flows around a circular cylinder at different Reynolds numbers10.1088/1873-7005/abb91d ↗
19. Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow10.1063/5.0039845 ↗
20. Parametric exploration on the airfoil design space by numerical design of experiment methodology and multiple regression model10.1177/0957650919850426 ↗
21. Modeling multiresponse surfaces for airfoil design with multiple-output-Gaussian-process regression10.2514/1.c032465 ↗
22. Artificial neural networks in fluid dynamics: A novel approach to the Navier-Stokes equations
23. Turbulence closure for high Reynolds number airfoil flows by deep neural networks10.1016/j.ast.2020.106452 ↗
24. Sensor hybridization using neural networks for rocket terminal guidance10.1016/j.ast.2021.106527 ↗
25. An improved hybrid modeling method based on extreme learning machine for gas turbine engine10.1016/j.ast.2020.106333 ↗
26. Constrained motion planning of free-float dual-arm space manipulator via deep reinforcement learning10.1016/j.ast.2020.106446 ↗
27. Reinforcement learning for angle-only intercept guidance of maneuvering targets10.1016/j.ast.2020.105746 ↗
28. How transferable are features in deep neural networks?
29. Domain-adversarial training of neural networks
30. Fracture acoustic emission signals identification of stay cables in bridge engineering application using deep transfer learning and wavelet analysis10.1186/s43251-020-00006-7 ↗
31. Structural damage detection using deep convolutional neural network and transfer learning10.1007/s12205-019-0437-z ↗
32. Deep transfer learning for image-based structural damage recognition10.1111/mice.12363 ↗
33. Deep convolutional neural networks with transfer learning for computer vision-based data-driven pavement distress detection10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110 ↗
34. Easy-to-deploy API extraction by multi-level feature embedding and transfer learning10.1109/TSE.2019.2946830 ↗
35. A survey on transfer learning10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 ↗
36. Deconvolutional networks
37. Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning
38. 2001 · 64
39. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks10.1109/78.650093 ↗
40. Clustered-hybrid multilayer perceptron network for pattern recognition application10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.017 ↗
41. Approximating polynomial functions by feedforward artificial neural networks: Capacity analysis and design10.1016/s0096-3003(96)00338-4 ↗