Validation of theoretical analysis of surface bending strain in polymer films by surface-labeled grating method
Source abstract
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of tension and compression imposed on surfaces of bending polymer films plays a key role in the design of flexible electronic devices. For over a decade, the analysis has relied on the classical beam theory that mainly deals with metals, glass, and cement; however, the applicable limit of the theory to largely bending polymer films has never been validated. We present that the classical beam theory accurately analyzes surface bending strains in single-layer and double-layer polymer films through measuring the strains by a surface-labeled grating method. The experimental analysis reveals that the bending strains on the outer and inner surfaces of the single-layer film are symmetrical, whereas those of the double-layer film are asymmetrical. These results are well explained by the classical beam theory considering stress–strain curves of polymer films. This approach will further advance the strain design of polymer films, which aids in the development of mechanically durable devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology 1 , Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology 2 , Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 2008
2. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 170053510.1002/aenm.201700535 ↗
3. Science · 2011 · 333 · 83810.1126/science.1206157 ↗
4. J. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 51 · 277110.1007/s10853-015-9643-3 ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 13 · 13910.1038/s41565-017-0018-6 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 04390210.1063/1.5134526 ↗
7. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 267310.1002/adfm.200800306 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 117710.1063/1.123478 ↗
9. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1115610.1038/ncomms11156 ↗
10. Nature · 2003 · 423 · 13610.1038/423136a ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 03311010.1063/1.4891328 ↗
12. Displays · 2004 · 25 · 310.1016/j.displa.2004.04.001 ↗
13. Science · 2010 · 327 · 160310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
14. Nature · 2013 · 499 · 45810.1038/nature12314 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21310510.1063/1.3432446 ↗
16. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 4 · 537710.1038/srep05377 ↗
17. Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 8 · 200166210.1002/admi.202001662 ↗
18. Adv. Mater. Technol. · 2019 · 4 · 180062610.1002/admt.201800626 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 111 · 12190610.1063/1.4993560 ↗
20. ACS Nano · 2015 · 9 · 625210.1021/acsnano.5b01613 ↗
21. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 29610.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Express · 2017 · 10 · 08720110.7567/apex.10.087201 ↗
23. Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 77310.1038/srep00773 ↗
24. J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1085410.1039/c4ta00494a ↗
25. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 519610.1021/acsami.5b11175 ↗
26. Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 819410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03698 ↗
27. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 4312210.1021/acsami.8b18141 ↗
28. 1961
29. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 05650210.35848/1882-0786/ab8346 ↗
30. Soft Matter · 2021 · 17 · 404010.1039/d0sm02233k ↗