journal article·2021-03-01Open access

Comparison of water nanodroplet properties on different graphite-based substrates

Monojoy Goswami, Navin Kumar, Yuzhan Li, Orlando Rios, Damilola O. Akamo, Jason Hirschey, Tim J. LaClair, Kyle R. Gluesenkamp

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 3

Abstract

The molecular structure and dynamics of water differ considerably at various interfaces. We compare the interfacial water structure–property relationship on three different carbon substrates, namely, amorphous carbon, compressed expanded natural graphite, and pure graphite by utilizing atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. The effect of different substrates on the structural and dynamical properties of water can readily be observed. The density distributions parallel and normal to the substrates show oblate droplet structures. The normal to the substrate water distribution shows a strong hydration layer at the interface that does not vary with substrates. However, the disparity in the structure and dynamics on three different substrates shows that the surface morphologies of the substrates are critical for determining nanoscale water properties. Furthermore, it is observed that the formation of an interfacial water layer or the hydration layer is a direct consequence of both water “confinement” at the nanoscale and “attraction” between water molecules and the carbon substrates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Graphene research and applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA

Building and Transportation Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2 , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, USA

Materials Science and Engineering Department, University of Tennessee 3 , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA

The Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research, University of Tennessee 4 , Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA

Mechanical Engineering Department, Georgia Institute of Technology 5 , Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · 819310.1073/pnas.1705303114 ↗
2. Science · 2008 · 319 · 58210.1126/science.1131939 ↗
3. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2003 · 15 · R166910.1088/0953-8984/15/45/r01 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. E · 2018 · 98 · 06240710.1103/physreve.98.062407 ↗
5. Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 66 · 285510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.022 ↗
6. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 102610.1038/nnano.2016.262 ↗
7. Carbon · 2013 · 60 · 11710.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.004 ↗
8. Renewable Energy · 2017 · 106 · 32110.1016/j.renene.2017.01.032 ↗
9. Theory and molecular models for water10.1002/9780470143810.ch1 ↗
10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 637410.1073/pnas.1014970108 ↗
11. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2001 · 123 · 1072110.1021/ja016324k ↗
12. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 204710.1021/jp013289v ↗
13. Science · 2004 · 305 · 160510.1126/science.1101176 ↗
14. Nature · 2005 · 437 · 64010.1038/nature04162 ↗
15. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2009 · 106 · 412210.1073/pnas.0812409106 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Express · 2011 · 4 · 12510210.1143/apex.4.125102 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 17610110.1103/physrevlett.109.176101 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 22610110.1103/physrevlett.111.226101 ↗
19. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 2847010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10267 ↗
20. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 06715010.1063/1.4923193 ↗
21. Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 1107810.1021/la901402f ↗
22. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1617010.1073/pnas.1105189108 ↗
23. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 107 · 134510.1021/jp0268112 ↗
24. Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 240210.1038/s41467-018-04816-2 ↗
25. J. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 51 · 55410.1007/s10853-015-9284-6 ↗
26. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2005 · 50 · 9310.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.01.001 ↗
27. J. Chem. Phys. · 2000 · 112 · 647210.1063/1.481208 ↗
28. J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 626910.1021/j100308a038 ↗
29. J. Comput. Phys. · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
30. Fluid Phase Equilib. · 2012 · 332 · 17310.1016/j.fluid.2012.07.010 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. E · 2011 · 84 · 06160210.1103/physreve.84.061602 ↗
32. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 18 · 01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
33. J. Mol. Graph. · 1996 · 14 · 3310.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
34. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 20541010.1103/physrevb.100.205410 ↗
35. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · 22710.1073/pnas.1612893114 ↗
36. J. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 141 · 18C51910.1063/1.4897249 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 1982 · 25 · 416710.1103/physrevb.25.4167 ↗
38. Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 132610.1103/physrevb.27.1326 ↗
39. Mol. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 141510.1080/00268971003762134 ↗
40. A. K. Soper, “Water and ice structure in the range 220–365 K from radiation total scattering experiments,” arXiv:1411.1322 [cond-mat.dis-nn] (2014).
41. Chem. Rev. · 2002 · 102 · 265110.1021/cr0006831 ↗
42. Nature · 2015 · 519 · 44310.1038/nature14295 ↗
43. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 535410.1103/physrevb.29.5354 ↗
44. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 536310.1103/physrevb.29.5363 ↗
45. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 1394410.1039/c8cp00933c ↗