Metaheuristic optimization approach and computational study on advanced mathematical modeling of solar cell
Source abstract
Abstract
A solar cell current usually depends on bandgap, carrier lifetime, diffusion length, diffusion constant, ideality factor, and so on. This article proposes a model that shows direct dependency of bandgap in the solar cell current equation. It is based on foundation principles satisfactory of a single junction being extended to multi-junction solar cell applications with different bandgaps. Different proven optimization techniques such as the Gauss–Newton optimization, Levenberg–Marquardt optimization, differential evolution algorithm, and whale optimization algorithm (WOA) were used for parameter extraction and optimization. To demonstrate the better optimization of model data with experimental data, further analysis of results was carried out on the basis of percentage deviation and error comparison. Complete comprehensive and comparative analysis of results of error and percentage deviation from different standard iterative optimization techniques proves the WOA as one of the best optimization techniques among all. As a result, the WOA offers a better optimal solution of model parameters with the best convergence of model data with the experimental data that shows the smallest possible value of error and minimum percentage deviation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · solar cell performance optimization · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Photonics, National Chiao Tung University , Hsinchu 30050, Taiwan
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Energy · 2013 · 112 · 18510.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.004 ↗
2. Sol. Cells · 1982 · 5 · 37710.1016/0379-6787(82)90008-4 ↗
3. Am. J. Phys. · 1977 · 45 · 60210.1119/1.10811 ↗
4. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 1995 · 37 · 12310.1016/0927-0248(94)00201-0 ↗
5. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy · 2015 · 7 · 01312710.1063/1.4909540 ↗
6. Sol. Energy · 2017 · 153 · 36010.1016/j.solener.2017.05.076 ↗
7. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2004 · 81 · 26910.1016/j.solmat.2003.11.018 ↗
8. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy · 2014 · 6 · 01120310.1063/1.4828366 ↗
9. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 50 · 04DP1310.7567/jjap.50.04dp13 ↗
10. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2016 · 15 · 67310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.163 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 70 · 760810.1063/1.349717 ↗
12. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3010710.1038/srep30107 ↗
13. Energy Convers. · 1977 · 17 · 110.1016/0013-7480(77)90050-x ↗
14. Sol. Cells · 1982 · 5 · 19910.1016/0379-6787(82)90027-8 ↗
15. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2014 · 122 · 16410.1016/j.solmat.2013.11.011 ↗
16. Sol. Energy · 2014 · 110 · 78110.1016/j.solener.2014.09.033 ↗
17. Energy · 2015 · 93 · 151510.1016/j.energy.2015.08.019 ↗
18. Sol. Energy · 2011 · 85 · 234910.1016/j.solener.2011.06.025 ↗
19. J. Mammal. · 1979 · 60 · 15510.2307/1379766 ↗
20. Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput. · 2009 · 1 · 24610.1504/ijbic.2009.024723 ↗
21. Int. J. Neural Syst. · 2010 · 20 · 10910.1142/s0129065710002292 ↗