Optimization of configuration of corrugated airfoil using deep reinforcement learning and transfer learning
Source abstract
Abstract
An optimization method combining deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was developed, and its effectiveness and limitations are investigated. As a target to apply the method, an optimization problem to find geometry parameters of the wavy airfoil that maximizes the lift–drag ratio is set. Twin delayed deep deterministic policy gradient (TD3) is adopted as the DRL algorithm. The CFD code based on the standard scheme for viscous incompressible flows is used for the calculation of the lift–drag ratio. The neural networks learn a policy for improving the lift–drag ratio by changing the geometry parameters of the airfoil at the fixed angle of attack (AoA) of 0° and successfully achieve a maximum lift–drag ratio: the obtained final shape is almost the same as that acquired by the gradient method. However, when the global optimal solution is near the penalized region, the DRL has the disadvantage of tending to fall into local optima. The effects of several parameters of DRL, such as the reward function and the number of sample points in random exploration, are investigated. Moreover, by using a trained neural network at an AoA of 0°, a converged solution can be obtained more quickly for an AoA different from those of the trained case if an appropriate reward function is set. This indicates the possibility of transfer learning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osaka University , 2-1 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Funding
Kurata Memorial Hitachi Science and Technology Foundation · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance10.1017/jfm.2016.615 ↗
2. Physics-informed machine learning approach for reconstructing Reynolds stress modeling discrepancies based on DNS data10.1103/physrevfluids.2.034603 ↗
3. Predictive large-eddy-simulation wall modeling via physics-informed neural networks10.1103/physrevfluids.4.034602 ↗
4. Machine-learning-based reduced-order modeling for unsteady flows around bluff bodies of various shapes10.1007/s00162-020-00528-w ↗
5. A novel in situ compression method for CFD data based on generative adversarial network10.1007/s12650-018-0519-x ↗
6. Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge10.1038/nature24270 ↗
7. Application of deep reinforcement learning for feedback control of a circular cylinder wake
8. Optimization of LPT blade using deep reinforcement learning
9. Aerodynamic shape optimization using a novel optimizer based on machine learning techniques10.1016/j.ast.2019.02.003 ↗
10. Robust active flow control over a range of Reynolds numbers using an artificial neural network trained through deep reinforcement learning10.1063/5.0006492 ↗
11. Flow visualization study of the aerodynamics of modeled dragonfly wings10.2514/1.43836 ↗
12. An experimental study of a bio-inspired corrugated airfoil for micro air vehicle applications10.1007/s00348-010-0826-z ↗
13. Aerodynamic performance of micro aerial wing structures at low Reynolds number10.13111/2066-8201.2019.11.1.8 ↗
14. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
15. C. J. C. H. Watkins, “Learning from delayed rewards,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University, 1989, pp. 1–234.
16. Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences10.1007/bf00115009 ↗
17. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning10.1038/nature14236 ↗
18. Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods
19. Deep reinforcement learning with double Q-learning
20. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks · 2011 · 315
21. Deep reinforcement learning: A survey10.1631/fitee.1900533 ↗
22. 2018
23. Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: A survey