journal article·2021-08-01Open access

Two-step treatment to obtain single-terminated SrTiO3 substrate and the related difference in both LaAlO3 film growth and electronic property

J. J. Peng, C. S. Hao, H. Y. Liu, Y. Yan

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

A two-step treatment, first chemical etching then thermal treatment, is proposed to achieve an atomically flat and thermally stable TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrate. LaAlO3 films were then grown on those TiO2-terminated and as-received substrates. LaAlO3 films on the TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrate maintained the layer-by-layer growth mode with a sharp interface, while films on the as-received substrates easily underwent reconstruction adverse to the sharp interface. Both LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces displayed metallic conductive behavior, while the difference in magnetotransport properties indicated the difference in origin for interface conductivity. Large positive magnetoresistance implied that the LaAlO3/as-received substrate interface was a 3D conductive interface dominated by oxygen vacancies. However, the annealed-LaAlO3/treated-substrate interface preserved intrinsic quasi-2D interface magnetism as evidenced by large negative magnetoresistance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Structural Transparencies for the Modern Traffic System, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials , Beijing 100095, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 05680210.1103/physrevlett.107.056802 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 70310.1038/nmat3674 ↗
3. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2021 · 7 · 200112010.1002/aelm.202001120 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 8 · 200147710.1002/admi.202001477 ↗
5. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1420910.1021/acsami.8b03275 ↗
6. Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 71510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03820 ↗
7. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1251410.1021/acsami.6b01655 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 241108(R)10.1103/physrevb.86.241108 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 24530710.1103/physrevb.84.245307 ↗
10. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2012 · 258 · 924210.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.117 ↗
11. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 107 · 10210.1016/s0169-4332(96)00512-0 ↗
12. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 12 · 313410.1021/acsami.9b17140 ↗
13. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 130–132 · 58210.1016/s0169-4332(98)00119-6 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 27210.1063/1.1771461 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 04160110.1063/1.3679379 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 161407(R)10.1103/physrevb.85.161407 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 07531210.1103/physrevb.84.075312 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 14040310.1103/physrevb.80.140403 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 12680310.1103/physrevlett.104.126803 ↗