Two-step treatment to obtain single-terminated SrTiO3 substrate and the related difference in both LaAlO3 film growth and electronic property
Source abstract
Abstract
A two-step treatment, first chemical etching then thermal treatment, is proposed to achieve an atomically flat and thermally stable TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrate. LaAlO3 films were then grown on those TiO2-terminated and as-received substrates. LaAlO3 films on the TiO2-terminated SrTiO3 substrate maintained the layer-by-layer growth mode with a sharp interface, while films on the as-received substrates easily underwent reconstruction adverse to the sharp interface. Both LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interfaces displayed metallic conductive behavior, while the difference in magnetotransport properties indicated the difference in origin for interface conductivity. Large positive magnetoresistance implied that the LaAlO3/as-received substrate interface was a 3D conductive interface dominated by oxygen vacancies. However, the annealed-LaAlO3/treated-substrate interface preserved intrinsic quasi-2D interface magnetism as evidenced by large negative magnetoresistance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Advanced Structural Transparencies for the Modern Traffic System, Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials , Beijing 100095, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 05680210.1103/physrevlett.107.056802 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 70310.1038/nmat3674 ↗
3. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2021 · 7 · 200112010.1002/aelm.202001120 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 8 · 200147710.1002/admi.202001477 ↗
5. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 1420910.1021/acsami.8b03275 ↗
6. Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 71510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03820 ↗
7. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 1251410.1021/acsami.6b01655 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 241108(R)10.1103/physrevb.86.241108 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 24530710.1103/physrevb.84.245307 ↗
10. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2012 · 258 · 924210.1016/j.apsusc.2012.01.117 ↗
11. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 107 · 10210.1016/s0169-4332(96)00512-0 ↗
12. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 12 · 313410.1021/acsami.9b17140 ↗
13. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 130–132 · 58210.1016/s0169-4332(98)00119-6 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 85 · 27210.1063/1.1771461 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 04160110.1063/1.3679379 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 161407(R)10.1103/physrevb.85.161407 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 07531210.1103/physrevb.84.075312 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 14040310.1103/physrevb.80.140403 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 12680310.1103/physrevlett.104.126803 ↗