journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Growth and characterization of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7−δ bilayers

Jacob J. Wisser, Yuri Suzuki

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Understanding the interplay of ferromagnets and superconductors requires high quality interfaces. To this end, we have fabricated heterostructures of the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) with the metallic ferromagnet La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 (LSMO) via pulsed laser deposition on SrTiO3 (STO) (001) and (LaAlO3)0.3(Sr2TaAlO6)0.7 (LSAT) (001) substrates. By varying the YBCO thickness from 1.7-13.6 nm while keeping the LSMO thickness at 12 nm, we have studied the interplay between ferromagnetism and superconductivity in the in-plane transport and magnetic properties of the bilayers. X-ray reflectivity data indicate the presence of a 2-3 nm thick interfacial layer between the LSMO and YBCO layers in all heterostructures. In-plane transport measurements exhibit suppression of the superconducting transition temperature from bulk YBCO values. Magnetometry measurements indicate high LSMO saturation magnetization values for samples grown on STO substrates and even higher (bulk-like) magnetization for bilayers grown on LSAT substrates. Together these results indicate that the interdiffused layer is largely attributed to a modified YBCO layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA and , Stanford, California 94305, USA

Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA and , Stanford, California 94305, USA

Funding

National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2005 · 77 · 93510.1103/revmodphys.77.935 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 10451910.1103/physrevb.99.104519 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 06451010.1103/physrevb.83.064510 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 07700310.1103/physrevlett.121.077003 ↗
5. Fiz. Nizk. Temp. · 2016 · 42 · 1115
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 10451310.1103/physrevb.73.104513 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 22450210.1103/physrevb.69.224502 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 05700210.1103/physrevlett.94.057002 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 01450910.1103/physrevb.100.014509 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 14050910.1103/physrevb.71.140509 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 09450410.1103/physrevb.74.094504 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 04700210.1103/physrevlett.100.047002 ↗
13. Science · 2007 · 318 · 111410.1126/science.1149338 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 01260110.1063/1.4813110 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 20720510.1103/physrevlett.108.207205 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 09451510.1103/physrevb.78.094515 ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 373210.1038/s41598-018-22036-y ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 13450910.1103/physrevb.79.134509 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 05450110.1103/PhysRevB.75.054501 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 19350610.1063/1.4829141 ↗
21. Nat. Mater. · 2018 · 17 · 49910.1038/s41563-018-0058-9 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 02450710.1103/physrevb.99.024507 ↗
23. Applied Physics Letters · 2019 · 115 · 13240410.1063/1.5111326 ↗
24. Applied Physics Letters · 2020 · 116 · 14240610.1063/5.0003628 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 22442310.1103/physrevb.94.224423 ↗
26. Scientific Reports · 2017 · 7 · 1177410.1038/s41598-017-10281-6 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 393610.1103/physrevlett.83.3936 ↗
28. Applied Physics Letters · 2000 · 76 · 346910.1063/1.126680 ↗
29. Physical Review B · 2004 · 69 · 13442810.1103/physrevb.69.134428 ↗