Growth and characterization of La0.67Sr0.33MnO3/YBa2Cu3O7−δ bilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding the interplay of ferromagnets and superconductors requires high quality interfaces. To this end, we have fabricated heterostructures of the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3O7−δ (YBCO) with the metallic ferromagnet La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 (LSMO) via pulsed laser deposition on SrTiO3 (STO) (001) and (LaAlO3)0.3(Sr2TaAlO6)0.7 (LSAT) (001) substrates. By varying the YBCO thickness from 1.7-13.6 nm while keeping the LSMO thickness at 12 nm, we have studied the interplay between ferromagnetism and superconductivity in the in-plane transport and magnetic properties of the bilayers. X-ray reflectivity data indicate the presence of a 2-3 nm thick interfacial layer between the LSMO and YBCO layers in all heterostructures. In-plane transport measurements exhibit suppression of the superconducting transition temperature from bulk YBCO values. Magnetometry measurements indicate high LSMO saturation magnetization values for samples grown on STO substrates and even higher (bulk-like) magnetization for bilayers grown on LSAT substrates. Together these results indicate that the interdiffused layer is largely attributed to a modified YBCO layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA and , Stanford, California 94305, USA
Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, USA and , Stanford, California 94305, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Energy
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2005 · 77 · 93510.1103/revmodphys.77.935 ↗
2. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 10451910.1103/physrevb.99.104519 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 06451010.1103/physrevb.83.064510 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 07700310.1103/physrevlett.121.077003 ↗
5. Fiz. Nizk. Temp. · 2016 · 42 · 1115
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 10451310.1103/physrevb.73.104513 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 22450210.1103/physrevb.69.224502 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 05700210.1103/physrevlett.94.057002 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 01450910.1103/physrevb.100.014509 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 14050910.1103/physrevb.71.140509 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 09450410.1103/physrevb.74.094504 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 04700210.1103/physrevlett.100.047002 ↗
13. Science · 2007 · 318 · 111410.1126/science.1149338 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 01260110.1063/1.4813110 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 20720510.1103/physrevlett.108.207205 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 09451510.1103/physrevb.78.094515 ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 373210.1038/s41598-018-22036-y ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 13450910.1103/physrevb.79.134509 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 05450110.1103/PhysRevB.75.054501 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 19350610.1063/1.4829141 ↗
21. Nat. Mater. · 2018 · 17 · 49910.1038/s41563-018-0058-9 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 02450710.1103/physrevb.99.024507 ↗
23. Applied Physics Letters · 2019 · 115 · 13240410.1063/1.5111326 ↗
24. Applied Physics Letters · 2020 · 116 · 14240610.1063/5.0003628 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 22442310.1103/physrevb.94.224423 ↗
26. Scientific Reports · 2017 · 7 · 1177410.1038/s41598-017-10281-6 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 393610.1103/physrevlett.83.3936 ↗
28. Applied Physics Letters · 2000 · 76 · 346910.1063/1.126680 ↗
29. Physical Review B · 2004 · 69 · 13442810.1103/physrevb.69.134428 ↗