journal article·2019-12-01Open access

Using repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for evaluation motor cortex excitability

Tetsuya Torii, Aya Sato, Masakuni Iwahashi, Keiji Iramina

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 12

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effects of repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the motor cortex excitability. The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between the conditioning (first) stimulus and test (second) stimulus were 1,000, 200 and 100 ms. A total of 20 stimuli were delivered to the primary motor cortex using paired-pulse TMS at 10 s intervals, and the intensity of the magnetic stimulus was 110% of the resting motor threshold for each subject. For all ISIs, there was no significant correlation between the number of stimuli and the motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. However, there was slight correlation between the number of stimuli and the MEP amplitude in the 200 and 100 ms ISIs (200 and 100 ms ISIs: approximately r = −0.40; 1,000 ms ISI: r = −0.17). In addition, MEP amplitude increased during the second paired pulse stimulation when an ISI of 200 ms was used, but it decreased dramatically when an ISI of 100 ms was used. In contrast, MEP amplitude did not change significantly when a 1,000 ms ISI was employed. Therefore, 10 consecutive paired-pulse TMS stimuli with a 1,000 ms ISI may not have a cumulative effect on cortical excitability. Previous studies used a long duration (e.g., 6 minutes or longer by 0.1 Hz magnetic stimulation) of magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability. In evaluating cortical excitability by magnetic stimulation, it is important to shorten the period to reduce the subject’s burden and to prevent body movement. Thus, our present findings suggest that repetitive paired-pulse TMS with an ISI of 1,000 ms is suitable for the rapid evaluation of cortical excitability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies · Vestibular and auditory disorders · Muscle activation and electromyography studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Medical Care and Welfare Engineering, Tokai University 1 , Kumamoto 862-8652, Japan

Department of Clinical Engineering, Komatsu University 2 , Ishikawa 923-0921, Japan

Graduate School of Systems Life Sciences, Kyushu University 3 , Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Lancet · 1985 · 325 · 110610.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 583810.1063/1.345982 ↗
3. Neurology · 1997 · 48 · 139810.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 ↗
4. Exp. Brain Res. · 2000 · 133 · 42510.1007/s002210000432 ↗
5. Brain · 1994 · 117 · 84710.1093/brain/117.4.847 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2018 · 54 · 500080410.1109/tmag.2018.2851358 ↗
7. J. Physiol. · 1993 · 471 · 50110.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912 ↗
8. J. Physiol. · 1997 · 498 · 81710.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp021905 ↗
9. Clin Neurophysiol. · 2019 · 130 · 191710.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.027 ↗
10. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. · 1992 · 85 · 35510.1016/0168-5597(92)90048-g ↗
11. J Headache Pain. · 2018 · 19 · 6510.1186/s10194-018-0897-4 ↗
12. Brain Stimul. · 2018 · 11 · 81810.1016/j.brs.2018.03.008 ↗
13. Front Neurosci. · 2019 · 13 · 70310.3389/fnins.2019.00703 ↗
14. Med Eng Phys. · 2016 · 38 · 81310.1016/j.medengphy.2016.04.025 ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 117 · 17B30310.1063/1.4908303 ↗
16. Hum Brain Mapp · 2018 · 40 · 127610.1002/hbm.24448 ↗
17. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. · 1998 · 108 · 110.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8 ↗
18. Exp. Brain Res. · 1999 · 128 · 53910.1007/s002210050878 ↗
19. Brain Stimul. · 2015 · 8 · 112410.1016/j.brs.2015.07.027 ↗
20. Brain Stimul. · 2018 · 11 · 32210.1016/j.brs.2017.10.014 ↗