Energy landscape structure of small graph isomorphism under variational optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
We investigate a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization formulation of the graph isomorphism problem using the quantum approximate optimization algorithm and the variational quantum eigensolver. For small graph instances, we observe that isomorphic pairs exhibit consistent clustering in variational energies, indicating that the Hamiltonian successfully encodes structural features. However, we demonstrate that low variational energy alone is an unreliable certifier of isomorphism due to the high probability of converging to infeasible states that violate bijection constraints. To address this, we analyze optimization trajectories rather than final energies, consistently outperforming naive energy thresholding, although absolute performance remains limited. Our results characterize the current limits of variational algorithms for graph isomorphism, positioning energy landscape analysis as a diagnostic tool rather than a scalable decision procedure in the noisy intermediate scale quantum regime.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum many-body systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Calcutta Institute of Engineering and Management, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology 1 , Kolkata,
Department of Chemistry, University of Dhaka 2 , Dhaka,
Institute of Theoretical and Applied Informatics, Polish Academy of Sciences 3 , Bałtycka 5, 44-100 Gliwice,
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Graph isomorphism in quasipolynomial time (extended abstract)10.1145/2897518.2897542 ↗
2. A perspective on protein structure prediction using quantum computers10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00067 ↗
3. RinQ: Towards predicting central sites in proteins on current quantum computers10.1016/j.mtquan.2025.100053 ↗
4. O. Kyriienko , C.Umeano, and Z.Holmes, “Advantage for discrete variational quantum algorithms in circuit recompilation,” arXiv:2510.01154 (2025).
5. Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?10.1038/s41467-025-63099-6 ↗
6. A near-term quantum simulation of the transverse field Ising model hints at glassy dynamics10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01630-y ↗
7. Harnessing the VQE to simulate quantum chemistry in an undergraduate project: Properties of hydrogen, oxygen and water molecules
8. Spin chemistry simulation via hybrid-quantum machine learning
9. Variational quantum algorithms10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 ↗
10. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 ↗
11. From pulses to circuits and back again: A quantum optimal control perspective on variational quantum algorithms10.1103/prxquantum.2.010101 ↗
12. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor10.1038/ncomms5213 ↗
13. E. Farhi , J.Goldstone, and S.Gutmann, “A quantum approximate optimization algorithm,” arXiv:1411.4028 (2014).
14. Ising formulations of many np problems10.3389/fphy.2014.00005 ↗
15. A cross-disciplinary introduction to quantum annealing-based algorithms10.1080/00107514.2018.1450720 ↗
16. Optimization using quantum mechanics: Quantum annealing through adiabatic evolution10.1088/0305-4470/39/36/r01 ↗
17. Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem preprocessing: Theory and empirical analysis10.1002/net.21751 ↗
18. Quadratic and higher-order unconstrained binary optimization of railway dispatching problem for quantum computing10.1007/s11128-022-03670-y ↗
19. O. Shehab and S. J.Lomonaco, Jr., “Quantum Fourier sampling is guaranteed to fail to compute automorphism groups of easy graphs,” arXiv:1705.00760 (2017).
20. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism10.1145/1857914.1857918 ↗
21. Quantum mechanical algorithms for the nonabelian hidden subgroup problem
22. Experimental quantum annealing: Case study involving the graph isomorphism problem10.1038/srep11168 ↗
23. Qubo formulations for the graph isomorphism problem and related problems10.1016/j.tcs.2017.04.016 ↗
24. E. Farhi , J.Goldstone, S.Gutmann, and M.Sipser, “Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution,” arXiv:quant-ph/0001106 (2000).
25. Ising models for binary clustering via adiabatic quantum computing
26. Quantum adiabatic machine learning10.1007/s11128-012-0506-4 ↗
27. Unconstrained binary models of the travelling salesman problem variants for quantum optimization10.1007/s11128-021-03405-5 ↗
28. New hybrid quantum annealing algorithms for solving vehicle routing problem
29. M. Szegedy , “What do QAOA energies reveal about graphs?,” arXiv:1912.12277 (2019).
30. On the structure of polynomial time reducibility10.1145/321864.321877 ↗
31. Quantum algorithms and the Fourier transform10.1098/rspa.1998.0163 ↗
32. Simulating spin dynamics with quantum computers10.1119/5.0112717 ↗
33. Simulating spin biology using a digital quantum computer: Prospects on a near-term quantum hardware emulator10.1063/5.0213120 ↗
34. Symmetric trotterization in digital quantum simulation of quantum spin dynamics10.1007/s40042-023-00722-z ↗
35. A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an np-complete problem10.1126/science.1057726 ↗
36. R. Majumdar , D.Madan, D.Bhoumik, D.Vinayagamurthy, S.Raghunathan, and S.Sur-Kolay, “Optimizing ansatz design in QAOA for max-cut,” arXiv:2106.02812 (2021).
37. The quantum alternating operator ansatz on maximum k-vertex cover
38. Variational quantum factoring10.1007/978-3-030-14082-3 ↗
39. Meta-optimization of resources on quantum computers10.1038/s41598-024-59618-y ↗
40. The Peierls argument for higher dimensional Ising models10.1088/0143-0807/35/3/035002 ↗