journal article·2021-01-01Open access

Switching performance comparison between conventional SOT and STT-SOT write schemes with effect of shape deformation

J. Byun, D. H. Kang, M. Shin

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

We demonstrate the effect of shape deformation in spin–orbit torque magnetoresistive random access memory (SOT-MRAM) based on micromagnetic simulation by generating 1000 randomly deformed samples using the exponentially decaying autocorrelation function. The conventional in-plane magnetic field-assisted SOT write scheme and the recently proposed spin-transfer torque-spin-orbit torque (STT-SOT) hybrid write scheme were simulated and compared with the effect of the Gilbert damping constant (α) considered in the presence and the absence of the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI). We found that shape deformation of the MTJ can result in write failure or degradation of the switching time. To compensate the device-to-device performance variation induced by the shape deformation, the condition of high α and the presence of the DMI is desired for the magnetic field-assisted write scheme. The STT-SOT shows slight improvement in the switching performance for larger α and the presence of DMI while it retains 100% switching probability even with small α regardless of the DMI.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology , Daejeon 34141, South Korea

Funding

Samsung

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 687610.1109/access.2019.2963727 ↗
2. 2019
3. 2019
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 04240610.1063/1.4863407 ↗
5. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 17441110.1103/physrevb.87.174411 ↗
6. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 304210.1038/ncomms4042 ↗
7. IEEE Transactions on Multi-Scale Computing Systems · 2016 · 2 · 4910.1109/tmscs.2015.2509963 ↗
8. 2018
9. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 12 · 98010.1038/nnano.2017.151 ↗
10. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 279910.1038/s41598-020-59533-y ↗
11. 2017
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 267610.1063/1.1544424 ↗
13. OOMMF user’s guide, version 1.0
14. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 186110.1109/ted.2013.2258348 ↗
15. J. Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, MOEMS · 2010 · 9 · 04121110.1117/1.3504697 ↗
16. J. Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, MOEMS · 2018 · 17 · 02400210.1117/1.JMM.17.2.024002 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 18442210.1103/physrevb.88.184422 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 14442410.1103/physrevb.92.144424 ↗
19. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 310520510.1109/LMAG.2016.2592865 ↗
20. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2018 · 9 · 310180410.1109/lmag.2018.2801834 ↗
21. Nanotechnology · 2019 · 30 · 37520210.1088/1361-6528/ab2831 ↗
22. 2010 · 52
23. IEEE J. Explor. Solid-State Computat. · 2019 · 5 · 17310.1109/jxcdc.2019.2951837 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 114 · 02240110.1063/1.5052194 ↗
25. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2017 · 16 · 113810.1109/tnano.2017.2754406 ↗
26. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1015610.1038/srep10156 ↗