Effect of asymmetric Pt thickness on the inverse spin Hall voltage in Pt/Co/Pt trilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) is an effective technique for probing the magnetization dynamics of magnetic thin films. In particular, bilayer systems composed of a paramagnetic layer and a ferromagnetic layer are commonly used for FMR-driven spin pumping experiments. Spin pump-and-probe models have been adopted to obtain the spin Hall angle (θSHE) and spin diffusion length (λN) for various single layer and bilayer systems. Trilayer systems, however, have rarely been studied with the same model. In this work, we study the structural asymmetry effect on Pt/Co/Pt trilayers and find that the different thicknesses of Pt on two sides of Co may change the spin current sign. Furthermore, we propose a method that allows analysis of Pt/Co/Pt trilayers using the spin pump-and-probe model. The obtained values of θPt and λPt in the Pt/Co/Pt system are 0.116 nm and 1.15 nm, respectively, which are consistent with the values obtained from other Pt-based bilayer systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taiwan University 1 , Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University 2 , Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Center of Atomic Initiative for New Materials, National Taiwan University 3 , Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Funding
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · National Taiwan University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2004 · 306 · 191010.1126/science.1105514 ↗
2. Nature · 2006 · 442 · 17610.1038/nature04937 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 15660110.1103/physrevlett.98.156601 ↗
4. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 89810.1038/nmat2860 ↗
5. Nature · 2008 · 455 · 77810.1038/nature07321 ↗
6. Science · 2012 · 101 · 12240410.1063/1.4753947 ↗
7. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2013 · 8 · 58710.1038/nnano.2013.145 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 10391310.1063/1.3587173 ↗
9. Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 661210.1038/s41598-017-06861-1 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 14440810.1103/physrevb.85.144408 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 18250910.1063/1.2199473 ↗
12. Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 14 · 134410.1016/j.cap.2014.07.013 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 23531710.1103/physrevb.89.235317 ↗
14. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 05600410.1088/0953-8984/28/5/056004 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 23210110.1063/1.5127213 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 09390910.1063/1.2197087 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 08391510.1063/1.2799068 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 11760110.1103/physrevlett.88.117601 ↗
19. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2002 · 77 · 137510.1103/revmodphys.77.1375 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 06442610.1103/physrevb.92.064426 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 24241410.1063/1.4848102 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 05443710.1103/physrevb.92.054437 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 19251110.1063/1.3660586 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 21442310.1103/physrevb.85.214423 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17260310.1063/1.4913813 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 15241210.1063/1.4898593 ↗