Vibrational stability of graphene
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical stability of graphene as temperature rises is analyzed based on three different self-consistent phonon (SCP) models. Compared with three-dimensional (3-D) materials, the critical temperature Ti at which instability occurs for graphene is much closer to its melting temperature Tm obtained from Monte Carlo simulation (Ti ≃ 2Tm, K. V. Zakharchenko, A. Fasolino, J. H. Los, and M. I. Katsnelson, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 202202). This suggests that thermal vibration plays a significant role in melting of graphene while melting for 3-D materials is often dominated by topologic defects. This peculiar property of graphene derives from its high structural anisotropy, which is characterized by the vibrational anisotropic coefficient (VAC), defined upon its Lindermann ratios in different directions. For any carbon based material with a graphene-like structure, the VAC value must be smaller than 5.4 to maintain its stability. It is also found that the high VAC value of graphene is responsible for its negative thermal expansion coefficient at low temperature range. We believe that the VAC can be regarded as a new criterion concerning the vibrational stability of any low-dimensional (low-D) materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-Sen University 1 Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, , 510275 GZ, China
Sun Yat-sen University 2 State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, School of Physics and Engineering, , 510275, Guangzhou, China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
2. Nature · 2005 · 438 · 19710.1038/nature04233 ↗
3. Nature Physics · 2006 · 2 · 17710.1038/nphys245 ↗
4. Helv. Phys. Acta · 1923 · 7 · 81
5. Ann. st. Henri Poincare · 1935 · 5 · 177
6. Phys. Z. Sowjet. · 1937 · 11 · 26
7. Phys. Rev. · 1968 · 176 · 110.1103/PhysRev.176.250 ↗
8. Nature · 2007 · 446 · 6010.1038/nature05545 ↗
9. Nature Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 85810.1038/nmat2011 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 04680810.1103/PhysRevLett.102.046808 ↗
11. Science · 2009 · 323 · 2710.1126/science.1166999 ↗
12. Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 104510.1021/nl204283q ↗
13. J. Phys. C · 1973 · 6 · 118110.1088/0022-3719/6/7/010 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1978 · 41 · 12110.1103/PhysRevLett.41.121 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. B · 1979 · 19 · 245710.1103/PhysRevB.19.2457 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. B · 1979 · 19 · 185510.1103/PhysRevB.19.1855 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 1010.1103/PhysRevB.27.6019 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1970 · 1 · 2
19. 1967
20. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1969 · 22 · 77710.1103/PhysRevLett.22.777 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 21410210.1103/PhysRevB.72.214102 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 24541310.1103/PhysRevB.74.245413 ↗
23. Phys. Z. · 1910 · 11 · 609
24. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23 · 20220210.1088/0953-8984/23/20/202202 ↗
25. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 128 · 50110.1016/0009-2614(86)80661-3 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 19542010.1103/PhysRevB.81.195420 ↗
27. Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 358210.1021/nl801386m ↗
28. ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 2610.1021/nn102598m ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 48 · 93310.1103/PhysRevLett.48.933 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 28 · 17810.1103/PhysRevB.28.178 ↗
31. Surface Science · 2011 · 605 · 161110.1016/j.susc.2010.10.036 ↗