journal article·2024-02-01Open access

Advancements in neural network techniques for electric and magnetic field reconstruction: Application to ion radiography

C.-S. Jao, Y.-C. Chen, F. Nikaido, Y.-L. Liu, K. Sakai, T. Minami, S. Isayama, Y. Abe, Y. Kuramitsu

AIP Advances· Volume 14· Issue 2

Abstract

In the realm of high-energy-density laboratory plasma experiments, ion radiography is a vital tool for measuring electromagnetic fields. Leveraging the deflection of injected protons, ion imaging can reveal the intricate patterns of electromagnetic fields within the plasma. However, the complex task of reconstructing electromagnetic fields within the plasma system from ion images presents a formidable challenge. In response, we propose the application of neural network techniques to facilitate electromagnetic field reconstructions. For the training data, we generate corresponding particle data on ion radiography with diverse field profiles in the plasma system, drawing from analytical solutions of charged particle motions and test-particle simulations. With these training data, our expectation is that the developed neural network can assimilate information from ion radiography and accurately predict the corresponding field profiles. In this study, our primary emphasis is on developing these techniques within the context of the simplest setups, specifically uniform (single-layer) or two-layer systems. We begin by examining systems with only electric or magnetic fields and subsequently extend our exploration to systems with combined electromagnetic fields. Our findings demonstrate the viability of employing neural networks for electromagnetic field reconstructions. In all the presented scenarios, the correlation coefficients between the actual and neural network-predicted values consistently reach 0.99. We have also learned that physics concepts can help us understand the weaknesses in neural network performance and identify directions for improvement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena · Computational Physics and Python Applications · Magnetic confinement fusion research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, National Cheng Kung University 1 , Tainan City 70101, Taiwan

National Center for High-Performance Computing, National Applied Research Laboratories 2 , Tainan City 711010, Taiwan

Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University 3 , Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Institute of Space and Plasma Sciences, National Cheng Kung University 4 , Tainan City 70101, Taiwan

National Institute for Fusion Science 5 , Gifu 509-5202, Japan

Department of Earth System Science and Technology, Kyushu University 6 , Fukuoka 816-8580, Japan

Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University 7 , Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council · National Institutes of Natural Sciences · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Contemp. Phys. · 2014 · 55 · 25610.1080/00107514.2014.909533 ↗
2. Introduction to high-energy-density physics10.1007/978-3-319-67711-8_1 ↗
3. Astrophys. J., Lett. · 2019 · 883 · L3710.3847/2041-8213/ab4190 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. E · 2022 · 106 · 05520510.1103/physreve.106.055205 ↗
5. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2012 · 54 · 12404910.1088/0741-3335/54/12/124049 ↗
6. Nat. Phys. · 2014 · 10 · 52010.1038/nphys2978 ↗
7. Phys. Plasmas · 2017 · 24 · 09290110.1063/1.4993204 ↗
8. Sci. Rep. · 2022 · 12 · 1976710.1038/s41598-022-24155-z ↗
9. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2021 · 127 · 17500210.1103/physrevlett.127.175002 ↗
10. High Energy Density Phys. · 2019 · 32 · 3110.1016/j.hedp.2019.04.001 ↗
11. Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 510910.1038/s41467-018-07415-3 ↗
12. Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. · 2023 · 7 · 2410.1007/s41614-023-00125-4 ↗
13. Nat. Phys. · 2023 · 19 · 25410.1038/s41567-022-01839-x ↗
14. Phys. Rep. · 2015 · 601 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.002 ↗
15. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2019 · 91 · 02500210.1103/revmodphys.91.025002 ↗
16. High Power Laser Sci. Eng. · 2021 · 9 · e4910.1017/hpl.2021.35 ↗
17. New Astron. Rev. · 2022 · 95 · 10166110.1016/j.newar.2022.101661 ↗
18. Proton imaging of high-energy-density laboratory plasmas10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045007 ↗
19. Nucl. Fusion · 2018 · 59 · 03500110.1088/1741-4326/aaf0e3 ↗
20. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2021 · 92 · 06352410.1063/5.0043845 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 152910.1063/1.1560554 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 19500110.1103/physrevlett.95.195001 ↗
23. Phys. Plasmas · 2002 · 9 · 221410.1063/1.1459457 ↗
24. Nat. Phys. · 2012 · 8 · 80910.1038/nphys2434 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 05500110.1103/physrevlett.99.055001 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 103 · 08500110.1103/physrevlett.103.085001 ↗
27. J. Plasma Phys. · 2017 · 83 · 90583061410.1017/s0022377817000939 ↗
28. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2017 · 88 · 12350710.1063/1.5013029 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. E · 2017 · 95 · 02330610.1103/physreve.95.023306 ↗
30. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2020 · 48 · 110.1109/tps.2019.2961571 ↗
31. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2023 · 51 · 175010.1109/tps.2023.3268170 ↗
32. A. Döpp , C.Eberle, S.Howard, F.Irshad, J.Lin, and M.Streeter, “Data-driven science and machine learning methods in laser-plasma physics,” arXiv:2212.00026 [cs.LG] (2023).10.1017/hpl.2023.47 ↗
33. Optimization of laser-driven quantum beam generation and the applications with artificial intelligence
34. Automation of etch pit analyses on solid-state nuclear track detectors with machine learning for laser-driven ion acceleration10.1063/5.0172202 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. E · 2017 · 95 · 04330510.1103/physreve.95.043305 ↗
36. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 46 · 528110.1143/jjap.46.5281 ↗