Flamelet generated manifold simulation of highly swirling spray combustion: Adoption of a mixed homogeneous reactor and inclusion of liquid-flame heat transfer
Source abstract
Abstract
We undertake the modeling of the combustion of highly swirling fuel sprays using the Flamelet-Generated-Manifold (FGM) combustion-chemistry-reduction technique, especially the use of adiabatic tables generated with non-premixed chemical reactors. Preceding investigations indicated that tables thus generated can present uncertainties when used for predicting the finite-rate phenomena and different flame modes, and these are important for better prediction of spray flames in gas turbines. Thus, to address these, we have adopted a mixed-homogeneous chemical reactor that is applicable to both pre-mixed and non-premixed reactions and evaluated this using detailed computations of a constant-pressure mixed reactor. In addition, we have included curated levels of flame-liquid heat gain and loss in the generation of the FGM libraries and analyzed the effects on the major species formation. The methodologies were then incorporated into a Reynolds-averaged-Navier-Stokes model to analyze the data from the reacting ethanol spray flames, and the results were tested against the values of the mixture fraction at axial locations, the burner power output, the flame heat release structure, and the mean of the flame lift-off. The computed burner power output and mean flame lift-off were ∼90.4% and ∼89.6% of the reported experimental data, respectively. Compared with the newest published large-eddy-simulation data, the predictions for the mixture fraction values especially at the center of the flame in the central-recirculation-zone were not underestimated, and the spatial distribution of the flame OH captured the flame height and shape better. The inclusion of mixed homogeneous reactors and flame-liquid heat transfer in FGM can enhance their use in spray-combustion studies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Combustion and flame dynamics · Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies · Fire dynamics and safety research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Fluid and Complex Systems, Coventry University 1 , Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
Institute for Future Transport and Cities, Coventry University 2 , Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University 3 , Coventry CV1 5FB, United Kingdom
, Eindhoven University of Technology TU/e 4 Department of Mechanical Engineering Multiphase and Reactive Flows , Eindhoven 5600 MB, Netherlands
Funding
UGC-UKIERI
References (99)
Show source-provided references
1. Reduced kinetic models and their application to practical combustion systems10.1016/0360-1285(94)00022-v ↗
2. Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations10.1016/j.pecs.2008.10.002 ↗
3. Model reduction for combustion chemistry10.1007/978-94-007-0412-1 ↗
4. Energy, environment, and sustainability
5. The CSP method for simplifying kinetics10.1002/kin.550260408 ↗
6. Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space10.1016/0010-2180(92)90034-m ↗
7. Transport-chemistry coupling in the reduced description of reactive flows10.1080/13647830701200000 ↗
8. A CSP and tabulation-based adaptive chemistry model10.1080/13647830600763595 ↗
9. Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion10.1016/s0360-1285(99)00006-4 ↗
10. Conditional moment closure method with tabulated chemistry in adiabatic turbulent nonpremixed jet flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111652 ↗
11. Modelling of premixed laminar flames using flamelet-generated manifolds10.1080/00102200008935814 ↗
12. Modelling of premixed counterflow flames using the flamelet-generated manifold method10.1088/1364-7830/6/3/305 ↗
13. A numerical study of confined triple flames using a flamelet-generated manifold10.1088/1364-7830/8/1/008 ↗
14. Modeling of complex premixed burner systems by using flamelet-generated manifolds10.1016/s0010-2180(01)00316-9 ↗
15. Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80594-9 ↗
16. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion10.1016/0360-1285(84)90114-x ↗
17. Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion10.1016/s0082-0784(88)80355-2 ↗
18. 2002
19. Abtahizadeh, S. E., “Numerical study of mild combustion: From laminar flames to large eddy simulation of turbulent flames with flamelet generated manifolds,” Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, 2014.
20. Numerical study of mild combustion with entrainment of burned gas into oxidizer and/or fuel streams10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.02.004 ↗
21. Numerical and experimental investigations on the influence of preheating and dilution on transition of laminar coflow diffusion flames to mild combustion regime10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.020 ↗
22. Development of a novel flamelet-based model to include preferential diffusion effects in autoignition of CH4/H2 flames10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.06.015 ↗
23. LES of delft jet-in-hot coflow burner to investigate the effect of preferential diffusion on autoignition of CH4/H2 flames10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.054 ↗
24. The flamelet generated manifold method applied to steady planar partially premixed counterflow flames10.1080/00102200500241198 ↗
25. A 5-D implementation of FGM for the large eddy simulation of a stratified swirled flame with heat loss in a gas turbine combustor10.1007/s10494-016-9777-7 ↗
26. A numerical analysis of the structure of a turbulent hydrogen jet lifted flame10.1016/s1540-7489(02)80245-0 ↗
27. Counterflow diffusion flame with polydisperse sprays10.1016/s1540-7489(02)80076-1 ↗
28. Combustion of partially premixed spray jets10.1016/j.proci.2004.08.034 ↗
29. DNS analysis of partially premixed combustion in spray and gaseous turbulent flame-bases stabilized in hot air10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.11.006 ↗
30. Partially premixed flamelet in LES of acetone spray flames10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.020 ↗
31. Brito Lopes, A. V., and Emekwuru, N., “Impact of the number of computational parcels on the prediction of highly swirling spray-flame mode and structure,” in Proceedings of the 10th European Combustion Meeting, Virtual ed. 14–15 April 2021, available at https://www.ecm2021napoli.eu/proceedings/[01 June 2021]
32. On the highly swirling flow through a confined bluff-body10.1063/1.5141531 ↗
33. Forced ignition of turbulent spray flames10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.044 ↗
34. First application of the flamelet generated manifold (FGM) approach to the simulation of an igniting diesel spray
35. Ayyapureddi, S., Egüz, U., Bekdemir, C., Somers, B., de Goey, P., and Albrecht, B., “Modeling of conventional and early diesel injection combustion characteristics using FGM approach,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2013-01-1108, 2013.10.4271/2013-01-1108 ↗
36. Radiation modelling in non-luminous nonpremixed turbulent flames10.1080/00102209708935703 ↗
37. Spectral radiative effects and turbulence/radiation interaction in a non-luminous turbulent jet diffusion flame10.1016/s0010-2180(02)00542-4 ↗
38. Numerical investigation of ethanol spray-in-hot-coflow flame using steady flamelet model
39. Effect of turbulence non-isotropy modeling on spray dynamics for an evaporating Acetone spray jet10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.10.009 ↗
40. Large eddy simulations of partially premixed ethanol dilute spray flames using the flamelet generated manifold mode10.1080/13647830.2016.1159732 ↗
41. Investigation of extinction and reignition events using the flamelet generated manifold model
42. Development of a non-adiabatic flamelet model for reacting flows with heat loss
43. Transported PDF modeling of ethanol spray in hot-diluted coflow flame10.1007/s10494-015-9623-3 ↗
44. Manifold resolution study of the FGM method for an igniting diesel spray10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.090 ↗
45. Predicting diesel combustion characteristics with large-eddy simulations including tabulated chemical kinetics10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.160 ↗
46. Large eddy simulation of n-dodecane spray flames using flamelet generated manifolds10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.02.019 ↗
47. LES/CMC simulations of swirl-stabilised ethanol spray flames approaching blow-off10.1007/s10494-016-9762-1 ↗
48. Detailed chemistry LES/CMC simulation of a swirling ethanol spray flame approaching blow-off10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.035 ↗
49. Effect of heat loss on laminar flamelet species concentration10.1007/s11630-016-0879-2 ↗
50. Modeling of spray jet flame under MILD condition with non-adiabatic FGM and a new conditional droplet injection model10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.12.025 ↗
51. Yuan, R., “Measurements in swirl-stabilised spray flames at blow-off,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2015.
52. 1972
53. Cavaliere, D. E., “Blow-off in gas turbine combustors,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2013.
54. A comparison of the blow-off behaviour of swirl-stabilized premixed, non-premixed and spray flames10.1007/s10494-013-9470-z ↗
55. 2017
56. Structure of igniting ethanol and n-heptane spray flames with and without swirl10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.020 ↗
57. Analysis of low-temperature chemistry in a turbulent swirling spray flame near lean blow-out10.1016/j.proci.2020.08.030 ↗
58. Large-eddy simulation of ECN spray A: Sensitivity study on modeling assumptions10.3390/en13133360 ↗
59. Large-eddy simulation of tri-fuel combustion: Diesel spray assisted ignition of methanol-hydrogen blends10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.238 ↗
60. Ground effects on pressure fluctuations in the atmospheric boundary layer10.1017/s0022112078001251 ↗
61. Siemens, STAR-CCM+ v12.04 https://mdx.plm.automation.siemens.com/star-ccm-plus; 8 June 2017.
62. The particle-source-in cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas-droplet flows10.1115/1.3448756 ↗
63. Prediction of turbulent jet diffusion flame lift-off using a pdf transport equation10.1016/S0082-0784(82)80208-7 ↗
64. Direct numerical simulation of a passive scalar with imposed mean gradient in isotropic turbulence10.1063/1.869099 ↗
65. A DNS study of turbulent mixing of two passive scalars10.1063/1.868990 ↗
66. A detailed chemical kinetic model for high temperature ethanol oxidation10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(1999)31:3<183::aid-kin3>3.0.co;2-x ↗
67. LLNL, Ethanol https://combustion.llnl.gov/archived-mechanisms/ethanol; 15 November 2017, 2017.
68. On the predictability of chemical kinetics for the description of the combustion of simple fuels10.1590/s1678-58782011000400013 ↗
69. Aboussi, B., “Etude experimentale et modelisation de l'Oxydation de l'Ethanol [experimental study and modelling of ethanol oxidation],” Ph.D. thesis, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, 1991.
70. Direct numerical simulations of HCCI/SACI with ethanol10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.027 ↗
71. Ghajar, G., “Assessment of spray combustion models in Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes simulations of ethanol spray flame,” MSc. thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, 2019.
72. Hassan, A., “Modelling two chemistry mechanisms with ethanol fuel in complex chemistry and spray combustion using the sandia piloted combustor to investigate the flames using STAR-CCM+,” MSc. thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, 2018.
73. A new detailed ethanol kinetic mechanism at engine-relevant conditions10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03314 ↗
74. Regularization of reaction progress variable for application to flamelet-based combustion models10.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.029 ↗
75. A generalized FGM progress variable weight optimization using HEEDS
76. Fratalocchi, V., “Aspects of ethanol: Laminar, turbulent and dynamics combustion,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 2017.
77. On reduced mechanisms for methane-air combustion in nonpremixed flames10.1016/0010-2180(90)90122-8 ↗
78. Effects of turbulence-chemistry interactions on auto-ignition and flame structure for n-dodecane spray combustion10.1080/13647830.2019.1600722 ↗
79. Experimental investigation of turbulent flames in uniform dispersions of ethanol droplets10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.01.014 ↗
80. State-of-the-art in premixed combustion modeling using flamelet generated manifolds10.1016/j.pecs.2016.07.001 ↗
81. Experience with two-layer models combining the k-epsilon model with a one-equation model near the wall
82. A standard formulation of the steady convective mass transfer problem10.1016/0017-9310(60)90022-3 ↗
83. Review—The transient equation of motion for particles, bubbles, and droplets10.1115/1.2819127 ↗
84. 2011
85. Aspects of computer simulation of liquid-fueled combustors10.2514/3.62687 ↗
86. Bonello, B., “Spray Combustion Analyses: Comparison of Turbulence Models,” MSc. thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, 2018.
87. On the utility of GPU accelerated high-order methods for unsteady flow simulations: A comparison with industry-standard tools10.1016/j.jcp.2016.12.049 ↗
88. Numerical comparison of an ethanol spray using open FOAM and StarCCM+
89. Tang, Y., “Computational fluid dynamics study of aerosol transport and deposition mechanism,” Ph.D thesis, Texas A&M University, TX, 2012.
90. Persson, T., “Eulerian-Lagrangian modelling of multicomponent spray for aseptic treatment of carton bottles in the food process and packaging industry,” MSc. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 2013.
91. Ottosson, O., “CFD simulation of urea evaporation in STAR-CCM+,” MSc. thesis, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, 2019 Report.
92. Computational study of ethanol flameless combustion using fgm and steady flamelet
93. Brito Lopes, A. V., “Advanced Modelling of Turbulent Spray Flames in Aero Gas-Turbines with Liquid Bio-Fuels,” Ph.D. thesis, Coventry University, Coventry, 2021..
94. 2010
95. 2000
96. Analysis of the spray flame structure in a lab-scale burner using large eddy simulation and discrete particle simulation10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.10.013 ↗
97. Mahendar, S. K., “Mitigating knock in heavy duty spark ignition engines,” Ph.D. thesis, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 2021.
98. Investigation of operating range in a methanol fumigated diesel engine10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.067 ↗
99. Investigation to charge cooling effects and combustion characteristics of ethanol direct injection in a gasoline port injection10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.059 ↗