journal article·2022-07-01Open access

Comparison of different types of focusing probes in pulsed eddy current testing

Fan Yang, Zhaoyang Li, Yuewen Fu, Wenfeng Huang, Chenhuai Tang, Aisong Cao

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

Pulsed eddy current (PEC) testing has attracted widespread attention because of its unique advantages in detecting local defects in insulated pipes. In this paper, rectangular, U-shaped, and semicircular PEC focusing probes are designed, the magnetic energy utilization efficiency and focusing properties of the developed probes are simulated and compared, and their detection sensitivities are experimentally compared. The magnetic flux through specific surfaces is calculated to find the utilization of magnetic energy by the different probes, and the eddy current dissipation power is used to quantitatively describe the eddy current field focusing properties of various types of probes. The simulation results show that the magnetic field energy utilization efficiency of the semicircular focusing probe is significantly higher than that of the other two probes, but the eddy current field distributions of the three probes are similar, and the focusing properties are not significantly different. The experimental results show that the three types of PEC probes can effectively detect local defects under a certain lift-off. By calculating the detection sensitivity of different probes to defects under different lift-off conditions, it is determined that the detection sensitivity of the semicircular probe is significantly higher than that of the U-shaped probe and rectangular probe. The experimental results are consistent with the numerical simulation results. The research results are conducive to the optimal design of PEC focusing probes for insulated pipes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing (Ministry of Education), Nanchang Hangkong University 1 , Nanchang 330063, People’s Republic of China

Shanghai Special Equipment Supervision and Inspection Technology Research Institute 2 , Shanghai 200062, People’s Republic of China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Corrosion in high-temperature and supercritical water and aqueous solutions: A review10.1016/S0896-8446(03)00031-7 ↗
2. Severity of corrosion under insulation (CUI) to structures and strategies to detect it10.1515/corrrev-2018-0102 ↗
3. Pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing and evaluation: A review10.1007/s10033-017-0122-4 ↗
4. Lift-off effect reduction based on the dynamic trajectories of the received-signal fast Fourier transform in pulsed eddy current testing10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.01.010 ↗
5. Evaluation of pulsed eddy current response and detection of the thickness variation in the stainless steel10.1109/TMAG.2009.2024219 ↗
6. Development of pulsed eddy current instrument and probe for detection of sub-surface flaws in thick materials10.1080/02564602.2016.1216335 ↗
7. The pulsed eddy current differential probe to detect a thickness variation in an insulated stainless steel10.1007/s10921-010-0083-3 ↗
8. Simulation based on optimisation of pulsed eddy current probe design10.1080/10589750903242541 ↗
9. A funnel-shaped probe for sensitivity enhancement in pulse-modulation eddy current inspection of subsurface flaws in conductors10.1016/j.sna.2020.111991 ↗
10. Detection of the subsurface cracks in a stainless steel plate using pulsed eddy current10.1007/s10921-013-0188-6 ↗
11. Investigation of rectangular differential probes for pulsed eddy current non-destructive testing10.1784/insi.2016.58.2.87 ↗
12. Defect identification and evaluation based on three-dimensional magnetic field measurement of pulsed eddy current10.1784/insi.2009.51.6.310 ↗
13. Factors affecting spatial resolution in pulsed eddy current inspection of pipe10.1007/s10921-020-00679-0 ↗
14. Investigation of focusing properties of probes for pulsed eddy current testing10.1109/jsen.2021.3121147 ↗
15. Transient response of a driver-pickup coil probe in transient eddy current testing10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.04.008 ↗
16. Coupling pulse eddy current sensor for deeper defects NDT10.1016/j.sna.2019.03.029 ↗
17. Planar coil-based differential electromagnetic sensor with null-offset10.1016/j.sna.2010.09.008 ↗
18. Design and optimisation of mutual inductance based pulsed eddy current probe10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.091 ↗
19. Development of differential probes in pulsed eddy current testing for noise suppression10.1016/j.sna.2006.10.013 ↗
20. Detection of circumferential cracks in heat exchanger tubes using pulsed eddy current testing10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102444 ↗