journal article·2021-12-01Open access

Modeling and analysis of the piezomagnetic, electromagnetic, and magnetostrictive effects in a magnetostrictive transducer

Bowen Dai, Zhongbo He, Zhaoshu Yang, Jingtao Zhou, Guangming Xue, Guoping Liu

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

A comprehensive model is a basis for adequately understanding the energy conversion mechanism of magnetostrictive materials and guides the design of magnetostrictive devices. This paper established a fully coupled model that fully considered the piezomagnetic effect and the electromagnetic effect in its procedure of energy conversion. The proposed model can accurately predict the output voltage with different excitation levels and illustrate the interaction between physical fields. Based on the established model, we quantify the voltage contributed by the piezomagnetic effect and the electromagnetic effect. After a thorough analysis, we discovered that even though the voltage generation is always dominated by the piezomagnetic effect of the magnetostrictive material, the proportion from the electromagnetic effect will increase moderately with larger excitation levels. In addition, the magnetostrictive effect toward the output performance is also discussed, which proved to lead to a marginal impact on the voltage waveform.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Electric Motor Design and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Vehicle and Electrical Engineering, Army Engineering University, Shijiazhuang Campus 1 , Shijiazhuang 050003, China

State Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering, China Astronaut Research and Training Center 2 , Beijing 100094, China

Unit 63969 of PLA 3 , Nanjing 210028, China

Funding

National Science Foundation of China

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. NPG Asia Mater. · 2019 · 11 · 5910.1038/s41427-019-0160-8 ↗
2. Microsyst. Nanoeng. · 2021 · 7 · 2510.1038/s41378-021-00248-z ↗
3. Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2020 · 181 · 10569510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105695 ↗
4. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 2005510.1038/s41598-020-77058-2 ↗
5. Sens. Actuators, A · 2018 · 273 · 15910.1016/j.sna.2018.02.001 ↗
6. Sens. Actuators, A · 2018 · 276 · 20510.1016/j.sna.2018.04.020 ↗
7. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3425810.1038/srep34258 ↗
8. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2020 · 514 · 16726010.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167260 ↗
9. Heliyon · 2019 · 5 · e0113510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01135 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2009 · 45 · 410810.1109/tmag.2009.2021671 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1993 · 29 · 315010.1109/20.281119 ↗
12. J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 176010.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.035 ↗
13. J. Sound Vib. · 2017 · 391 · 3510.1016/j.jsv.2016.12.019 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 18391110.1063/1.4831666 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 06390610.1063/1.3318494 ↗
16. J. Sound Vib. · 2020 · 484 · 11553410.1016/j.jsv.2020.115534 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2007 · 43 · 143710.1109/TMAG.2007.891406 ↗
18. IEEE 1st International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry Leveraging a Better Tomorrow (RTSI) · 2015 · 2015 · 16110.1109/RTSI.2015.7325091 ↗
19. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 28 · 153710.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1992 · 28 · 2710.1109/20.119813 ↗
21. IEEE Sens. J. · 2020 · 20 · 632410.1109/jsen.2020.2976541 ↗
22. Sci. Rep. · 2019 · 9 · 1779310.1038/s41598-019-54343-3 ↗