Gd doping effect in p-type Bi2Te3 single crystals
Source abstract
Abstract
It is generally accepted that Bi2Te3 prepared from stoichiometric melts has p-type charge carriers generated from BiTe-type antisite defects, while Bi2Te3 grown under Te-rich condition becomes n-type due to another type of TeBi antisite defects. We report the magnetic and transport properties of GdxBi2-xTe3 prepared from stoichiometric melts, where p-type charge carriers are dominant. The physical properties of all the samples have no significant changes with varying the nominal Gd composition up to x = 0.2. Compared with n-type GdxBi2-xTe3 samples grown under Te-rich condition, we find low solubility for all the samples and no clear signature of antiferromagnetic order. These results suggest that the Gd doping rate in GdxBi2-xTe3 is governed by the type of antisite defects and charge carriers, so that the antiferromagnetic ordering is not eventually introduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Quantum many-body systems · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, Sogang University , Seoul 121-742, South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2013 · 82 · 10200110.7566/jpsj.82.102001 ↗
2. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2010 · 82 · 304510.1103/revmodphys.82.3045 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 10680310.1103/physrevlett.98.106803 ↗
4. Science · 2013 · 340 · 16710.1126/science.1234414 ↗
5. Science · 2010 · 329 · 6110.1126/science.1187485 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 16680210.1103/physrevlett.106.166802 ↗
7. Science · 2009 · 323 · 118410.1126/science.1167747 ↗
8. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 05740110.1103/physrevlett.105.057401 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 171110.1103/physrevb.49.1711 ↗
10. Physica B · 2002 · 311 · 29210.1016/s0921-4526(01)00975-9 ↗
11. New J. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 10301610.1088/1367-2630/15/10/103016 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07E31210.1063/1.3549553 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 19520310.1103/physrevb.81.195203 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 08240410.1063/1.3688043 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17C74810.1063/1.4918560 ↗
16. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1030910.1038/srep12182 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 25240110.1063/1.4922899 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 18240910.1063/1.4935120 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 24520910.1103/physrevb.81.245209 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 04110910.1103/physrevb.90.041109 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 22040810.1103/physrevb.84.220408 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 10040310.1103/physrevlett.106.100403 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 24241210.1063/1.4812292 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 02390410.1063/1.4861615 ↗
25. Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 215410.1002/adma.201200187 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 23513110.1103/physrevb.88.235131 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 12520910.1103/physrevb.77.125209 ↗
28. Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 510 · 14810.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.306 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 08130510.1103/physrevb.85.081305 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 05411310.1103/physrevb.94.054113 ↗
31. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 110.1063/1.1517164 ↗
32. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 96510.1038/nmat2898 ↗